Automation Integration · head to head
Nango vs Trigger.dev

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trigger.dev
Automation Integration
Build and deploy fully managed AI agents and workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.; Trigger.dev unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nango and Trigger.dev actually diverge.
| Attribute | Nango | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per connection per month | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Webhooks
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
Only in Trigger.dev
Nothing recorded that Nango does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot Trigger.dev
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot Trigger.dev
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot Trigger.dev
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev
- Job automation and workflow orchestrationnot Nango
- API-driven task schedulingnot Nango
- Background job processing for applicationsnot Nango
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
Trigger.dev
- Unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- No published Enterprise pricing; requires contacting sales
- HIPAA BAA compliance requires separate add-on request
- Pro plan uses conditional language that obscures exact overage costs
- Compute billing granularity is unclear; waits under 5 seconds still consume compute resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
Trigger.dev
Free- FreeFree
- $5 monthly credits
- 20 concurrent runs
- 1 day log retention
- Hobby$10/month
- $10 monthly credits
- 50 concurrent runs
- 7 day log retention
- Pro$50/month
- $50 monthly credits
- 200+ concurrent runs
- 30 day log retention
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom discounts
- RBAC and SSO
- SOC 2 reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Nango or Trigger.dev better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nango starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nango or Trigger.dev?
- Nango starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free.
- Does Nango or Trigger.dev run on more platforms?
- Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker. Trigger.dev runs on Web.
- Can I use Nango for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nango best used for?
- Nango is most often used for a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each, a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them, a company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendor, an engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in production. Of those, a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each and a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them are not what Trigger.dev is typically brought in for.
- What can Nango do that Trigger.dev cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
Trigger.dev: Is there a free plan for Trigger.dev?
Yes, the Free plan offers $5 in monthly credits, 20 concurrent runs, 1 day log retention, and community support at no cost.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
Trigger.dev: What's the starting price for a paid plan?
The Hobby plan costs $10 per month USD and includes $10 monthly credits, 50 concurrent runs, and 7 day log retention.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
Nango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
More on Trigger.dev
Other head to heads
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Zapier
- Nango vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Nango vs MuleSoft
- Nango vs Temporal
- Nango vs Inngest
- Nango vs Autonoly
- Nango vs Flowise
- Nango vs Dagster
- Nango vs Tray.io
- Nango vs Hightouch
- Nango vs Jitterbit
- Nango vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs Alloy Automation
- Trigger.dev vs Merge
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs Paragon
- Trigger.dev vs Windmill
- Trigger.dev vs Meltano
- Trigger.dev vs RudderStack
- Trigger.dev vs Flowable
- Trigger.dev vs Grouparoo
- Trigger.dev vs Airbyte
- Trigger.dev vs Cyclr
- Trigger.dev vs Activiti
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Workato
- Trigger.dev vs Automation Anywhere
- Trigger.dev vs Blue Prism
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs Zapier
- Trigger.dev vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Trigger.dev vs MuleSoft
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs Autonoly
- Trigger.dev vs Flowise
- Trigger.dev vs Dagster
- Trigger.dev vs Tray.io
- Trigger.dev vs Hightouch
- Trigger.dev vs Jitterbit
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
