Automation Integration · head to head
Trigger.dev vs Windmill

Trigger.dev
Automation Integration
Build and deploy fully managed AI agents and workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Trigger.dev unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Trigger.dev and Windmill actually diverge.
| Attribute | Trigger.dev | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | web, api, linux, windows, mac |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Trigger.dev
Nothing recorded that Windmill does not also cover.
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Trigger.dev
- Job automation and workflow orchestrationnot Windmill
- API-driven task schedulingnot Windmill
- Background job processing for applicationsnot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Trigger.dev
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Trigger.dev
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Trigger.dev
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Trigger.dev
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Trigger.dev
- Unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- No published Enterprise pricing; requires contacting sales
- HIPAA BAA compliance requires separate add-on request
- Pro plan uses conditional language that obscures exact overage costs
- Compute billing granularity is unclear; waits under 5 seconds still consume compute resources
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Trigger.dev
Free- FreeFree
- $5 monthly credits
- 20 concurrent runs
- 1 day log retention
- Hobby$10/month
- $10 monthly credits
- 50 concurrent runs
- 7 day log retention
- Pro$50/month
- $50 monthly credits
- 200+ concurrent runs
- 30 day log retention
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom discounts
- RBAC and SSO
- SOC 2 reports
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Trigger.dev or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Trigger.dev starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Trigger.dev or Windmill?
- Trigger.dev starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does Trigger.dev or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Trigger.dev runs on Web. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Trigger.dev for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Trigger.dev best used for?
- Trigger.dev is most often used for job automation and workflow orchestration, api-driven task scheduling, background job processing for applications. Of those, job automation and workflow orchestration and api-driven task scheduling are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Trigger.dev do that Windmill cannot?
- Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Trigger.dev: Is there a free plan for Trigger.dev?
Yes, the Free plan offers $5 in monthly credits, 20 concurrent runs, 1 day log retention, and community support at no cost.
SourceWindmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceTrigger.dev: What's the starting price for a paid plan?
The Hobby plan costs $10 per month USD and includes $10 monthly credits, 50 concurrent runs, and 7 day log retention.
SourceWindmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceWindmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
More on Trigger.dev
Other head to heads
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs Zapier
- Trigger.dev vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Trigger.dev vs MuleSoft
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs Autonoly
- Trigger.dev vs Flowise
- Trigger.dev vs Dagster
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Tray.io
- Trigger.dev vs Cyclr
- Trigger.dev vs Hightouch
- Trigger.dev vs Jitterbit
- Trigger.dev vs Nango
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs Airbyte
- Trigger.dev vs Flowable
- Trigger.dev vs Meltano
- Trigger.dev vs RudderStack
- Trigger.dev vs Grouparoo
- Trigger.dev vs Activiti
- Trigger.dev vs jBPM
- Trigger.dev vs Merge
- Trigger.dev vs Camunda
- Trigger.dev vs Automate.io
- Trigger.dev vs Boomi
- Trigger.dev vs Browser Use
- Trigger.dev vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Zapier
- Windmill vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Windmill vs MuleSoft
- Windmill vs Temporal
- Windmill vs Inngest
- Windmill vs CrewAI
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Dagster
- Windmill vs Prefect
- Windmill vs Tray.io
- Windmill vs Cyclr
- Windmill vs Hightouch
- Windmill vs Jitterbit
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Pipedream
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
