Automation Integration · head to head
Dagster vs Trigger.dev

Dagster
Automation Integration
Data orchestration platform with asset lineage and AI-native observability
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trigger.dev
Automation Integration
Build and deploy fully managed AI agents and workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dagster learning curve steeper than simpler task schedulers; Trigger.dev unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagster and Trigger.dev actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dagster | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free open-source core plus paid cloud platform | freemium |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagster
- Asset-centric orchestration
- Lineage tracking
- Data quality monitoring
- Multi-tool integration
- Branch deployments
- Dagster+ AI
- Hybrid deployment
Only in Trigger.dev
Nothing recorded that Dagster does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagster
- Orchestrating multi-stage data transformation pipelinesnot Trigger.dev
- Tracking data lineage across transformation toolsnot Trigger.dev
- Monitoring data quality and asset healthnot Trigger.dev
- Coordinating dbt and Snowflake workflowsnot Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev
- Job automation and workflow orchestrationnot Dagster
- API-driven task schedulingnot Dagster
- Background job processing for applicationsnot Dagster
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagster
- Learning curve steeper than simpler task schedulers
- Asset-centric model requires redesigning existing task-based pipelines
- Pricing complex with per-credit costs on top of base fee
- Open-source version requires self-hosting infrastructure
- Limited to data workflows; not suitable for general automation
Trigger.dev
- Unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- No published Enterprise pricing; requires contacting sales
- HIPAA BAA compliance requires separate add-on request
- Pro plan uses conditional language that obscures exact overage costs
- Compute billing granularity is unclear; waits under 5 seconds still consume compute resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagster
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted deployment
- Full orchestration engine
- Community support
- Solo$10/month
- 1 user and 1 code location
- Pay-as-you-go credits at $0.040 per credit
- 1 deployment
- Starter$100/month
- Up to 3 users and 5 code locations
- Better credit rate at $0.035 per credit
- 1 deployment
- Pro$null/custom
- Unlimited code locations and deployments
- Custom serverless compute pricing
- Personalized onboarding
Trigger.dev
Free- FreeFree
- $5 monthly credits
- 20 concurrent runs
- 1 day log retention
- Hobby$10/month
- $10 monthly credits
- 50 concurrent runs
- 7 day log retention
- Pro$50/month
- $50 monthly credits
- 200+ concurrent runs
- 30 day log retention
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom discounts
- RBAC and SSO
- SOC 2 reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagster if
- You need asset-centric orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want lineage tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagster or Trigger.dev better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagster starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagster or Trigger.dev?
- Dagster starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free.
- Does Dagster or Trigger.dev run on more platforms?
- Dagster runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Trigger.dev runs on Web.
- Can I use Dagster for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dagster best used for?
- Dagster is most often used for orchestrating multi-stage data transformation pipelines, tracking data lineage across transformation tools, monitoring data quality and asset health, coordinating dbt and snowflake workflows. Of those, orchestrating multi-stage data transformation pipelines and tracking data lineage across transformation tools are not what Trigger.dev is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagster do that Trigger.dev cannot?
- Dagster covers Asset-centric orchestration, Lineage tracking, Data quality monitoring, Multi-tool integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagster: What does Solo plan at $10/month include?
Solo includes 1 user, 1 code location, 1 deployment, and serverless compute at $0.010/minute, with 30-day free trial.
SourceTrigger.dev: Is there a free plan for Trigger.dev?
Yes, the Free plan offers $5 in monthly credits, 20 concurrent runs, 1 day log retention, and community support at no cost.
SourceDagster: How are credits calculated on Dagster+?
Each asset materialization and ops execution costs 1 credit. Solo plan charges $0.040 per credit; Starter reduces to $0.035 per credit.
SourceTrigger.dev: What's the starting price for a paid plan?
The Hobby plan costs $10 per month USD and includes $10 monthly credits, 50 concurrent runs, and 7 day log retention.
SourceDagster: Is Dagster open-source available for free?
Yes, Dagster open-source is free and includes the full orchestration engine for self-hosted deployment with community support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Trigger.dev
Other head to heads
- Dagster vs Mage AI
- Dagster vs Prefect
- Dagster vs Hatchet
- Dagster vs Meltano
- Dagster vs Temporal
- Dagster vs Parabola
- Dagster vs Browserbase
- Dagster vs Census
- Dagster vs Relevance AI
- Dagster vs Xano
- Dagster vs RudderStack
- Dagster vs Blue Prism
- Dagster vs Orkes
- Dagster vs Polytomic
- Dagster vs Salesforce Flows
- Dagster vs SnapLogic
- Dagster vs n8n
- Dagster vs Zapier
- Dagster vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Dagster vs MuleSoft
- Dagster vs Inngest
- Dagster vs CrewAI
- Dagster vs Autonoly
- Dagster vs Flowise
- Dagster vs Tray.io
- Dagster vs Cyclr
- Dagster vs Hightouch
- Dagster vs Jitterbit
- Dagster vs Nango
- Dagster vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs Mage AI
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Hatchet
- Trigger.dev vs Meltano
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Parabola
- Trigger.dev vs Browserbase
- Trigger.dev vs Census
- Trigger.dev vs Relevance AI
- Trigger.dev vs Xano
- Trigger.dev vs RudderStack
- Trigger.dev vs Blue Prism
- Trigger.dev vs Orkes
- Trigger.dev vs Polytomic
- Trigger.dev vs Salesforce Flows
- Trigger.dev vs SnapLogic
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs Zapier
- Trigger.dev vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Trigger.dev vs MuleSoft
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs Autonoly
- Trigger.dev vs Flowise
- Trigger.dev vs Tray.io
- Trigger.dev vs Cyclr
- Trigger.dev vs Hightouch
- Trigger.dev vs Jitterbit
- Trigger.dev vs Nango
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
