Automation Integration · head to head
Dify vs Nango

Dify
Automation Integration
The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dify free tier limited to 200 monthly message credits; Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dify and Nango actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dify
Nothing recorded that Nango does not also cover.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Webhooks
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dify
- AI workflow automationnot Nango
- Custom application deploymentnot Nango
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot Dify
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot Dify
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot Dify
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot Dify
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dify
- Free tier limited to 200 monthly message credits
- Professional tier supports only 3 team members
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dify
Free- SandboxFree
- 200 monthly message credits
- 1 workspace
- 5 apps
- Professional$590/year
- 5,000 monthly message credits
- 3 team members
- 50 apps
- Team$1590/year
- 10,000 monthly message credits
- 50 team members
- 200 apps
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Dify or Nango better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dify starts at Free and Nango at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dify or Nango?
- Dify starts at Free and Nango at Free.
- Does Dify or Nango run on more platforms?
- Dify runs on Web. Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Dify for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dify best used for?
- Dify is most often used for ai workflow automation, custom application deployment. Of those, ai workflow automation and custom application deployment are not what Nango is typically brought in for.
- What can Dify do that Nango cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dify: How much does Dify cost?
Dify Cloud offers a free Sandbox tier, Professional at $590/year with 5,000 monthly credits, and Team at $1,590/year with 10,000 monthly credits.
SourceNango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
Dify: Is Dify free to use?
Yes, Dify offers a free Sandbox tier with 200 monthly message credits, 1 workspace, 5 apps, and 50MB storage. Community edition is free and open-source.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
Dify: What are Dify's team collaboration limits?
Professional tier supports 3 team members. Team tier supports 50 team members. Enterprise plans with custom team sizes require contacting sales.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
Nango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dify vs n8n
- Dify vs Zapier
- Dify vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Dify vs MuleSoft
- Dify vs Prefect
- Dify vs Mage AI
- Dify vs Flowise
- Dify vs Inngest
- Dify vs Dagster
- Dify vs Parabola
- Dify vs Paragon
- Dify vs CrewAI
- Dify vs Browserbase
- Dify vs Camunda
- Dify vs Census
- Dify vs Decodable
- Dify vs Flowable
- Dify vs Alloy Automation
- Dify vs Merge
- Dify vs Windmill
- Dify vs Meltano
- Dify vs RudderStack
- Dify vs Grouparoo
- Dify vs Airbyte
- Dify vs Cyclr
- Dify vs Activiti
- Dify vs Workato
- Dify vs Automation Anywhere
- Dify vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Zapier
- Nango vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Nango vs MuleSoft
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Mage AI
- Nango vs Flowise
- Nango vs Inngest
- Nango vs Dagster
- Nango vs Parabola
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Browserbase
- Nango vs Camunda
- Nango vs Census
- Nango vs Decodable
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
