Automation & Integration · head to head
Microsoft Power Automate vs TeamViewer
Microsoft Power Automate
Automation & Integration
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TeamViewer
Communication & Collaboration
Remote access and support software from Germany, used for connecting to computers anywhere
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Power Automate free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans; TeamViewer pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Power Automate and TeamViewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Power Automate | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Desktop | Web |
| Category | Automation & Integration | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Power Automate
- Automated flows
- Instant flows
- Scheduled flows
- Desktop automation
- Process mining
- Business process flows
- Approval workflows
- 500+ connectors
Only in TeamViewer
Nothing recorded that Microsoft Power Automate does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Power Automate
- Workflow Automationnot TeamViewer
- Data Integrationnot TeamViewer
- Process Automationnot TeamViewer
- App Integrationnot TeamViewer
- API Connectivitynot TeamViewer
TeamViewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamViewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Power Automate
- Free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Not suitable for long-running workflows; can fail unexpectedly without warning
- Limited to simple linear logic; fails with complex workflows involving multiple stakeholders
- Tasks cannot automate at scale when requiring more than approximately 60 users
TeamViewer
- Pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
- Add-on modules (Asset Management, Endpoint Protection, Device Monitoring, Assist AR Lite, Mobile Device Management) are sold separately from the core license, only offered with a 30-day free trial before charges apply
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Power Automate
Free- FreeFree
- 750 flow runs/month
- Standard connectors only
- Basic cloud flows
- Premium$15/user/month
- Cloud flows (DPA)
- Attended RPA
- 250 MB Dataverse database
- Process$150/bot/month
- Unattended automation
- Cloud and desktop flows
- 50 MB Dataverse database
- Hosted Process$215/bot/month
- Microsoft-managed virtual machine
- Unattended automation
- Same Dataverse entitlements as Process plan
TeamViewer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamViewer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if
- You need automated flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- You also want instant flows.
Choose TeamViewer if
Nothing in the data separates TeamViewer from Microsoft Power Automate on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Power Automate or TeamViewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Power Automate starts at Free and TeamViewer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Power Automate or TeamViewer?
- Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Microsoft Power Automate and On request for TeamViewer.
- Does Microsoft Power Automate or TeamViewer run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Power Automate runs on Web, Cloud, Desktop. TeamViewer runs on Web.
- Can I use Microsoft Power Automate for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. TeamViewer starts at On request.
- What is Microsoft Power Automate best used for?
- Microsoft Power Automate is most often used for workflow automation, data integration, process automation, app integration. Of those, workflow automation and data integration are not what TeamViewer is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Power Automate do that TeamViewer cannot?
- Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Instant flows, Scheduled flows, Desktop automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Power Automate: Is Power Automate included with Microsoft 365?
Yes. If you have an eligible Microsoft 365 subscription, you can use Power Automate at no extra cost for flows relying only on standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams). Premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle) require paid plans.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: How many flow runs are allowed on the free plan?
Power Automate's free tier (included with Microsoft 365) is limited to 750 flow runs per month and standard connectors only. Out of 900+ total connectors, the free plan only includes Microsoft ecosystem apps and limited third-party apps.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: What's the difference between Premium and Process plans?
Premium ($15/user/month) provides attended automation with cloud flows and standard RPA. Process plan ($150/bot/month) enables unattended automation where bots run without human intervention on virtual machines for high-volume, repetitive tasks.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: Does Power Automate support long-running workflows?
No. Power Automate is not suitable for long-lasting workflows because they can run without warning and fail unexpectedly. The platform is built for linear, branching logic (if-then) rather than complex, multi-step business processes involving multiple stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Power Automate
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Power Automate vs n8n
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier
- Microsoft Power Automate vs MuleSoft
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Parabola
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier Plus
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Jitterbit
- Microsoft Power Automate vs mParticle
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Paragon
- Microsoft Power Automate vs RudderStack
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Airbyte
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Automate.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Boomi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browser Use
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browserbase
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Celigo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Census
- Microsoft Power Automate vs CrewAI
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zoom
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Microsoft Teams
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Loom
- Microsoft Power Automate vs RingCentral Video
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Slack
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Telegram
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Webex by Cisco
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Chanty
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Chatwork
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Flock
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Google Chat
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Grasshopper
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Lark
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Mattermost
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Quo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Rocket.Chat
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Signal
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Textline
- TeamViewer vs n8n
- TeamViewer vs Zapier
- TeamViewer vs MuleSoft
- TeamViewer vs Parabola
- TeamViewer vs Zapier Plus
- TeamViewer vs Jitterbit
- TeamViewer vs mParticle
- TeamViewer vs Paragon
- TeamViewer vs RudderStack
- TeamViewer vs Workato
- TeamViewer vs Airbyte
- TeamViewer vs Automate.io
- TeamViewer vs Boomi
- TeamViewer vs Browser Use
- TeamViewer vs Browserbase
- TeamViewer vs Celigo
- TeamViewer vs Census
- TeamViewer vs CrewAI
- TeamViewer vs Zoom
- TeamViewer vs Microsoft Teams
- TeamViewer vs Loom
- TeamViewer vs RingCentral Video
- TeamViewer vs Slack
- TeamViewer vs Telegram
- TeamViewer vs Webex by Cisco
- TeamViewer vs Chanty
- TeamViewer vs Chatwork
- TeamViewer vs Flock
- TeamViewer vs Google Chat
- TeamViewer vs Grasshopper
- TeamViewer vs Lark
- TeamViewer vs Mattermost
- TeamViewer vs Quo
- TeamViewer vs Rocket.Chat
- TeamViewer vs Signal
- TeamViewer vs Textline
