Mining · head to head
Maptek I-Site vs RPMGlobal XPAC

Maptek I-Site
Mining
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RPMGlobal XPAC
Mining
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Maptek I-Site no pricing information published on product page, requiring direct contact with Maptek sales for quotes; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maptek I-Site and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maptek I-Site | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 1981 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
- Laser scanners
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Maptek I-Site
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Maptek I-Site
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Maptek I-Site
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maptek I-Site
- No pricing information published on product page, requiring direct contact with Maptek sales for quotes
- No self-service pricing or trial options mentioned, creating barrier to entry for smaller organizations
- Product page focuses on technical specifications rather than pricing or licensing models
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is Maptek I-Site or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maptek I-Site starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maptek I-Site or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- Maptek I-Site starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does Maptek I-Site or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- Maptek I-Site runs on Windows. RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Maptek I-Site best used for?
- Maptek I-Site is most often used for laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings, geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes, volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud data. Of those, laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings and geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can Maptek I-Site do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Maptek I-Site: What is the pricing for Maptek i-site laser scanning products?
Pricing for Maptek i-site laser scanners (NS4, XR3, XR3-D, UR3) and related software tools is not published. Interested parties must contact Maptek through their support channels or complete a contact form to request a specification sheet and pricing information.
SourceMaptek I-Site: What geomatics software tools are available with i-site products?
Maptek offers related geomatics software including PointStudio, PointModeller, Sentry, FieldControl, FieldHHC, and Drive. Specific pricing and licensing for each software tool is not disclosed on the product page.
SourceMaptek I-Site: How can I get pricing and detailed specifications for i-site?
The product page includes a contact form prompting users to 'Request a spec sheet.' Interested customers can also access support email and general contact options to obtain pricing details and product specifications.
SourceRelated pages
More on Maptek I-Site
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Other head to heads
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs FLAC3D
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Envirosuite
- Maptek I-Site vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Maptek I-Site vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Maptek I-Site vs RS2
- Maptek I-Site vs Snowden Supervisor
- Maptek I-Site vs Wenco
- Maptek I-Site vs Whittle
- Maptek I-Site vs Seequent Central
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs UDEC
- Maptek I-Site vs MineRP
- Maptek I-Site vs PCBC
- Maptek I-Site vs K-MINE
- Maptek I-Site vs MinePlan
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan
- Maptek I-Site vs OptiMine
- Maptek I-Site vs Promine
- Maptek I-Site vs MineSched
- Maptek I-Site vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs FLAC3D
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Envirosuite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs EQuIS Enterprise
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Geoscience ANALYST
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs RS2
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Snowden Supervisor
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Wenco
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Whittle
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Seequent Central
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs 3DEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs UDEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineRP
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PCBC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs K-MINE
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MinePlan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs OptiMine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineSched
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
