Mining · head to head
Maptek I-Site vs Seequent Central

Maptek I-Site
Mining
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Seequent Central
Mining
Collaborative platform for subsurface data management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Maptek I-Site no pricing information published on product page, requiring direct contact with Maptek sales for quotes; Seequent Central cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- They diverge on capability: Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, Seequent Central covers Version control.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maptek I-Site and Seequent Central actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maptek I-Site | Seequent Central |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Cloud, Windows |
| Founded | 1981 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- Vulcan
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
Only in Seequent Central
- Version control
- Model publishing
- Data management
- Audit trails
- Secure sharing
- Leapfrog Geo
- Leapfrog Works
- Oasis montaj
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot Seequent Central
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot Seequent Central
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot Seequent Central
Seequent Central
- Centralised version control and audit trails for geological modelsnot Maptek I-Site
- Shared 3D visualisation of Leapfrog and Oasis montaj models across distributed teamsnot Maptek I-Site
- Project branching for scenario modellingnot Maptek I-Site
- Mining exploration and geothermal project coordinationnot Maptek I-Site
- Civil engineering and environmental projects needing a single model of recordnot Maptek I-Site
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maptek I-Site
- No pricing information published on product page, requiring direct contact with Maptek sales for quotes
- No self-service pricing or trial options mentioned, creating barrier to entry for smaller organizations
- Product page focuses on technical specifications rather than pricing or licensing models
Seequent Central
- Cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- Hosting instances start at a minimum 500GB of storage, with more sold as an add-on
- Billing splits into three separate lines: cloud hosting per organisation, user subscriptions per person and Leapfrog Connector licences per modeller
- Publishing models from Leapfrog into Central requires a separate Leapfrog Connector licence
- Value depends on already owning other Seequent tools such as Leapfrog, GeoStudio, PLAXIS or Oasis montaj
Pricing, plan by plan
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
Seequent Central
On request- Central Team$5000/year
- Version control
- 5 users included
- 100GB storage
- Central Professional$12000/year
- All Team features
- 25 users included
- 500GB storage
- Central EnterpriseFree
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited storage
- SSO integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Choose Seequent Central if
- You need version control.
- You work on Cloud, Windows.
- You also want model publishing.
Questions people ask
- Is Maptek I-Site or Seequent Central better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maptek I-Site starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maptek I-Site or Seequent Central?
- Maptek I-Site starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request.
- Does Maptek I-Site or Seequent Central run on more platforms?
- Maptek I-Site runs on Windows. Seequent Central runs on Cloud, Windows.
- What is Maptek I-Site best used for?
- Maptek I-Site is most often used for laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings, geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes, volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud data. Of those, laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings and geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes are not what Seequent Central is typically brought in for.
- What can Maptek I-Site do that Seequent Central cannot?
- Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement. Seequent Central covers Version control, Model publishing, Data management, Audit trails. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Maptek I-Site: What is the pricing for Maptek i-site laser scanning products?
Pricing for Maptek i-site laser scanners (NS4, XR3, XR3-D, UR3) and related software tools is not published. Interested parties must contact Maptek through their support channels or complete a contact form to request a specification sheet and pricing information.
SourceSeequent Central: How much does Seequent Central cost?
Pricing is not published on the Seequent website. For information about Central pricing and purchase, customers must contact Seequent's sales team directly.
SourceMaptek I-Site: What geomatics software tools are available with i-site products?
Maptek offers related geomatics software including PointStudio, PointModeller, Sentry, FieldControl, FieldHHC, and Drive. Specific pricing and licensing for each software tool is not disclosed on the product page.
SourceSeequent Central: What is the subscription model for Seequent Central?
Seequent Central uses a tiered subscription approach requiring one cloud hosting instance per organization (minimum 500GB storage on Microsoft Azure), one user subscription per person accessing Central, and one Leapfrog Connector per user modeling in Leapfrog.
SourceMaptek I-Site: How can I get pricing and detailed specifications for i-site?
The product page includes a contact form prompting users to 'Request a spec sheet.' Interested customers can also access support email and general contact options to obtain pricing details and product specifications.
SourceSeequent Central: Are there add-on options for Seequent Central?
Yes, an Advanced Bundle add-on is available for active Central subscribers, which includes web portal, data collection, and data entry tools.
SourceRelated pages
More on Maptek I-Site
More on Seequent Central
Other head to heads
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs FLAC3D
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Envirosuite
- Maptek I-Site vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Maptek I-Site vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Maptek I-Site vs RS2
- Maptek I-Site vs Snowden Supervisor
- Maptek I-Site vs Wenco
- Maptek I-Site vs Whittle
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs UDEC
- Maptek I-Site vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Maptek I-Site vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Cority EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs CorePlan
- Maptek I-Site vs IHS Markit Petra
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine
- Maptek I-Site vs K-MINE
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax Planner
- Maptek I-Site vs MinePlan
- Maptek I-Site vs MineRP
- Seequent Central vs Leapfrog Geo
- Seequent Central vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Seequent Central vs Deswik Suite
- Seequent Central vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Seequent Central vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Seequent Central vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Seequent Central vs FLAC3D
- Seequent Central vs Datamine Studio RM
- Seequent Central vs Envirosuite
- Seequent Central vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Seequent Central vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Seequent Central vs RS2
- Seequent Central vs Snowden Supervisor
- Seequent Central vs Wenco
- Seequent Central vs Whittle
- Seequent Central vs 3DEC
- Seequent Central vs UDEC
- Seequent Central vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Seequent Central vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Seequent Central vs Cority EHS
- Seequent Central vs CorePlan
- Seequent Central vs IHS Markit Petra
- Seequent Central vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Seequent Central vs Datamine
- Seequent Central vs K-MINE
- Seequent Central vs Minemax Planner
- Seequent Central vs MinePlan
- Seequent Central vs MineRP
