Mining & Resources · head to head
Maptek I-Site vs RS2

Maptek I-Site
Mining & Resources
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RS2
Mining & Resources
2D finite element stress analysis for mining
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models; RS2 the RS2 product page shows a USD per year pricing block with no figure filled in, so the annual lease cost is not published
- They diverge on capability: Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, RS2 covers 2D finite element analysis.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maptek I-Site and RS2 actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maptek I-Site | RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1981 | 1989 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- Vulcan
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
Only in RS2
- 2D finite element analysis
- Stress-strain modeling
- Slope stability assessment
- Bolt design
- Support sizing
- AutoCAD
- GeoStudio
- RocData
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot RS2
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot RS2
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot RS2
RS2
- Two dimensional finite element analysis of slopes, excavations and tunnelsnot Maptek I-Site
- Modelling groundwater seepage and consolidation in geotechnical designsnot Maptek I-Site
- Assessing rock and soil stability for mining and civil engineering projectsnot Maptek I-Site
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maptek I-Site
- The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
- No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form
RS2
- The RS2 product page shows a USD per year pricing block with no figure filled in, so the annual lease cost is not published
- RS2 is sold only as an annual cloud hosted lease; the page describes no perpetual licence
- The Personal Lease is one seat tied to one user device; using it across several machines requires the Flexible+ lease
- Hosting licences on a local server rather than Rocscience's RocPortal requires contacting the vendor
Pricing, plan by plan
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
RS2
On request- RS2 Standard$11000/year
- 2D finite element analysis
- Slope stability
- Excavation design
Which should you pick?
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Choose RS2 if
- You need 2d finite element analysis.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want stress-strain modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Maptek I-Site or RS2 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maptek I-Site starts at On request and RS2 at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maptek I-Site or RS2?
- Maptek I-Site starts at On request and RS2 at On request.
- Does Maptek I-Site or RS2 run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Maptek I-Site best used for?
- Maptek I-Site is most often used for laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings, geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes, volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud data. Of those, laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings and geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes are not what RS2 is typically brought in for.
- What can Maptek I-Site do that RS2 cannot?
- Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement. RS2 covers 2D finite element analysis, Stress-strain modeling, Slope stability assessment, Bolt design. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
More on Maptek I-Site
Other head to heads
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Micromine
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax
- Maptek I-Site vs Promine
- Maptek I-Site vs Surpac
- Maptek I-Site vs Trimble Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Carlson Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Cority EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Enablon EHS
- RS2 vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RS2 vs Leapfrog Geo
- RS2 vs Deswik Suite
- RS2 vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RS2 vs Datamine
- RS2 vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RS2 vs Micromine
- RS2 vs Datamine Studio RM
- RS2 vs Minemax
- RS2 vs Promine
- RS2 vs Surpac
- RS2 vs Trimble Mining
- RS2 vs Vulcan
- RS2 vs 3DEC
- RS2 vs acQuire GIM Suite
- RS2 vs Carlson Mining
- RS2 vs Cority EHS
- RS2 vs Enablon EHS
