Software · head to head
Maptek I-Site vs UDEC

Maptek I-Site
Software
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
U
UDEC
Software
Universal distinct element code for mining analysis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models; UDEC the UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, UDEC covers Distinct element modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maptek I-Site and UDEC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maptek I-Site | UDEC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1981).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- Vulcan
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
Only in UDEC
- Distinct element modeling
- Joint network modeling
- Block interaction analysis
- Support interaction
- Dynamic analysis
- FLAC3D
- 3DEC
- Leapfrog
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot UDEC
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot UDEC
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot UDEC
UDEC
- Two dimensional distinct element modelling of jointed and fractured rocknot Maptek I-Site
- Assessing stability of blocky rock slopes and underground excavationsnot Maptek I-Site
- Simulating fluid flow through rock fractures in mining and tunnellingnot Maptek I-Site
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maptek I-Site
- The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
- No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form
UDEC
- The UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Fluid Flow, Barton-Bandis joint analysis, Creep, Thermal and User Defined Models are optional add ons charged on top of the base licence
- Writing custom constitutive models requires the separately licensed UDM option and C++ programming
- Purchases through the Buy Now route are prepaid annual subscriptions rather than a permanent licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
UDEC
On request- UDEC Professional$19000/year
- Distinct element analysis
- Joint modeling
- Block interaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Choose UDEC if
- You need distinct element modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want joint network modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Maptek I-Site or UDEC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maptek I-Site starts at On request and UDEC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maptek I-Site or UDEC?
- Maptek I-Site starts at On request and UDEC at On request.
- Does Maptek I-Site or UDEC run on more platforms?
- Maptek I-Site runs on Windows. UDEC runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is Maptek I-Site best used for?
- Maptek I-Site is most often used for laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings, geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes, volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud data. Of those, laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workings and geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopes are not what UDEC is typically brought in for.
- What can Maptek I-Site do that UDEC cannot?
- Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement. UDEC covers Distinct element modeling, Joint network modeling, Block interaction analysis, Support interaction. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
More on Maptek I-Site
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Micromine
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax
- Maptek I-Site vs Promine
- Maptek I-Site vs Surpac
- Maptek I-Site vs Trimble Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Carlson Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Cority EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Enablon EHS
- UDEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- UDEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- UDEC vs Deswik Suite
- UDEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- UDEC vs Datamine
- UDEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- UDEC vs Micromine
- UDEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- UDEC vs Minemax
- UDEC vs Promine
- UDEC vs Surpac
- UDEC vs Trimble Mining
- UDEC vs Vulcan
- UDEC vs 3DEC
- UDEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- UDEC vs Carlson Mining
- UDEC vs Cority EHS
- UDEC vs Enablon EHS
