Software · head to head
K-MINE vs Maptek I-Site

Maptek I-Site
Software
3D laser scanning and point cloud processing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: K-MINE modules are licensed separately as annual subscriptions, from 2,700 USD a year for Infrastructure up to 9,480 USD a year for Open Pit Design; Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- They diverge on capability: K-MINE covers Mine planning, Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which K-MINE and Maptek I-Site actually diverge.
| Attribute | K-MINE | Maptek I-Site |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in K-MINE
- Mine planning
- 3D design
- Production scheduling
- Economic evaluation
- Risk analysis
- Surpac
- Datamine
- AutoCAD
Only in Maptek I-Site
- Point cloud processing
- 3D model creation
- Pit wall monitoring
- Stockpile measurement
- Change detection
- CAD systems
- GIS platforms
- Laser scanners
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
K-MINE
- Open pit surveying, pit design, scheduling and pit optimisationnot Maptek I-Site
- Underground mine design, stope optimisation and ventilation analysisnot Maptek I-Site
- Geological modelling and grade estimation from drillhole datanot Maptek I-Site
- Drill and blast design and slope stability analysisnot Maptek I-Site
Maptek I-Site
- Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot K-MINE
- Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot K-MINE
- Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot K-MINE
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
K-MINE
- Modules are licensed separately as annual subscriptions, from 2,700 USD a year for Infrastructure up to 9,480 USD a year for Open Pit Design
- Geology is 9,060 USD a year, Pit Optimizer 8,580 USD, Scheduling 7,380 USD, Stope Optimization 6,960 USD and Surveying 6,600 USD, so a full workflow means stacking several module subscriptions
- A licence is assigned either to a dedicated server or to a single computer workstation, with one active device at a time
- Licences are online, with offline access limited to 2 days
- Training is priced by custom quote and is not included in the published module rates
- Volume discounts are referenced but no discount rate or qualifying quantity is published
Maptek I-Site
- The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
- Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
- No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form
Pricing, plan by plan
K-MINE
On request- K-MINE Professional$9000/year
- Mine planning
- 3D design
- Scheduling
Maptek I-Site
On request- I-Site Studio$11000/year
- Point cloud processing
- 3D modeling
- Pit wall analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Maptek I-Site if
- You need point cloud processing.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d model creation.
Questions people ask
- Is K-MINE or Maptek I-Site better?
- Neither clearly leads. K-MINE starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, K-MINE or Maptek I-Site?
- K-MINE starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request.
- Does K-MINE or Maptek I-Site run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is K-MINE best used for?
- K-MINE is most often used for open pit surveying, pit design, scheduling and pit optimisation, underground mine design, stope optimisation and ventilation analysis, geological modelling and grade estimation from drillhole data, drill and blast design and slope stability analysis. Of those, open pit surveying, pit design, scheduling and pit optimisation and underground mine design, stope optimisation and ventilation analysis are not what Maptek I-Site is typically brought in for.
- What can K-MINE do that Maptek I-Site cannot?
- K-MINE covers Mine planning, 3D design, Production scheduling, Economic evaluation. Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.
Related pages
More on Maptek I-Site
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- K-MINE vs Caterpillar MineStar
- K-MINE vs Leapfrog Geo
- K-MINE vs Deswik Suite
- K-MINE vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- K-MINE vs Datamine
- K-MINE vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- K-MINE vs Micromine
- K-MINE vs Datamine Studio RM
- K-MINE vs Minemax
- K-MINE vs Promine
- K-MINE vs Surpac
- K-MINE vs Trimble Mining
- K-MINE vs Vulcan
- K-MINE vs 3DEC
- K-MINE vs acQuire GIM Suite
- K-MINE vs Carlson Mining
- K-MINE vs Cority EHS
- K-MINE vs Enablon EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Maptek I-Site vs Leapfrog Geo
- Maptek I-Site vs Deswik Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine
- Maptek I-Site vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Micromine
- Maptek I-Site vs Datamine Studio RM
- Maptek I-Site vs Minemax
- Maptek I-Site vs Promine
- Maptek I-Site vs Surpac
- Maptek I-Site vs Trimble Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Vulcan
- Maptek I-Site vs 3DEC
- Maptek I-Site vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Maptek I-Site vs Carlson Mining
- Maptek I-Site vs Cority EHS
- Maptek I-Site vs Enablon EHS

