Software · head to head
Minemax vs RPMGlobal XPAC

Minemax
Software
Integrated mining software for geological and operational excellence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RPMGlobal XPAC
Software
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Minemax minemax.com/products returns a 301 redirect to dataminesoftware.com; Minemax products are now sold within the Datamine planning range; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: Minemax covers Geological modeling, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Resource allocation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Minemax and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Minemax | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1995).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Minemax
- Geological modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Pit optimization
- Datamine
- Surpac
- Leapfrog
- SAP
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
- Web support
Both cover
- Production scheduling
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Minemax
- Strategic open pit and underground mine schedule optimisationnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Life of mine planning to maximise net present valuenot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Operational short interval mine schedulingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Minemax
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Minemax
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Minemax
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Minemax
- minemax.com/products returns a 301 redirect to dataminesoftware.com; Minemax products are now sold within the Datamine planning range
- No pricing is published for any Minemax product; licences are obtained by contacting the Datamine sales team
- Products are sold as role based Planning Bundles rather than individual licences, with the claimed saving of up to 33 percent measured against standalone licence cost
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
Minemax
On request- Minemax Standard$13000/year
- Geological modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Minemax Premium$23000/year
- Advanced optimization
- Production scheduling
- Fleet management
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose Minemax if
- You need geological modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want mine design.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need resource allocation.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want constraint optimization.
Questions people ask
- Is Minemax or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Minemax starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Minemax or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- Minemax starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does Minemax or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- Minemax runs on Windows. RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Minemax best used for?
- Minemax is most often used for strategic open pit and underground mine schedule optimisation, life of mine planning to maximise net present value, operational short interval mine scheduling. Of those, strategic open pit and underground mine schedule optimisation and life of mine planning to maximise net present value are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can Minemax do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- Minemax covers Geological modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation, Pit optimization. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning, Real-time updates. Both handle Production scheduling, Vulcan, Windows support.
Related pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Minemax vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Minemax vs Leapfrog Geo
- Minemax vs Deswik Suite
- Minemax vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Minemax vs Datamine
- Minemax vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Minemax vs Micromine
- Minemax vs Datamine Studio RM
- Minemax vs Maptek I-Site
- Minemax vs Promine
- Minemax vs Surpac
- Minemax vs Trimble Mining
- Minemax vs Vulcan
- Minemax vs 3DEC
- Minemax vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Minemax vs Carlson Mining
- Minemax vs Cority EHS
- Minemax vs Enablon EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maptek I-Site
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Trimble Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs 3DEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Carlson Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Cority EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS
