Mining · head to head
RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac

RPMGlobal XPAC
Mining
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Surpac
Mining
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all; Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
- They diverge on capability: RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Surpac covers Geological database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which RPMGlobal XPAC and Surpac actually diverge.
| Attribute | RPMGlobal XPAC | Surpac |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Windows |
| Founded | 1995 | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- Vulcan
- ERP systems
- Web support
Only in Surpac
- Geological database
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Workflow automation
- PCBC
- GEMS
- 3DEXPERIENCE
Both cover
- MineSched
- Whittle
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Surpac
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Surpac
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Surpac
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Mine planningnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Resource estimationnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Grade controlnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production trackingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Pricing, plan by plan
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Which should you pick?
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Choose Surpac if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want block modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is RPMGlobal XPAC or Surpac better?
- Neither clearly leads. RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Surpac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, RPMGlobal XPAC or Surpac?
- RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Surpac at On request.
- Does RPMGlobal XPAC or Surpac run on more platforms?
- RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web. Surpac runs on Windows.
- What is RPMGlobal XPAC best used for?
- RPMGlobal XPAC is most often used for midterm and strategic mine production scheduling, building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data, comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operations. Of those, midterm and strategic mine production scheduling and building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data are not what Surpac is typically brought in for.
- What can RPMGlobal XPAC do that Surpac cannot?
- RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Surpac covers Geological database, Block modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation. Both handle MineSched, Whittle, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Surpac: What is the pricing for GEOVIA Surpac?
GEOVIA Surpac does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing must be obtained by contacting Dassault Systèmes directly through their sales process.
SourceSurpac: Is a trial version available without contacting sales?
The product page does not mention a self-service trial. To access a trial or demo, you need to contact the sales team through the website's contact form.
SourceSurpac: Are there different editions or licensing options for Surpac?
The product page does not specify different editions or licensing options. Details about licensing variations are available only through direct contact with Dassault Systèmes.
SourceSurpac: How do I get started with GEOVIA Surpac?
To get started, you can join the GEOVIA user community or contact Dassault Systèmes directly using the contact link on the product page.
SourceRelated pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Other head to heads
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineRP
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PCBC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs K-MINE
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MinePlan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs OptiMine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineSched
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Whittle
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax Planner
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Carlson Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PLAXIS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs RS2
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Snowden Supervisor
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Seequent Central
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs MineRP
- Surpac vs PCBC
- Surpac vs K-MINE
- Surpac vs MinePlan
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs OptiMine
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs MineSched
- Surpac vs Whittle
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Minemax Planner
- Surpac vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs PLAXIS
- Surpac vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- Surpac vs RS2
- Surpac vs Snowden Supervisor
- Surpac vs Seequent Central
