Mining · head to head
RPMGlobal XPAC vs UDEC

RPMGlobal XPAC
Mining
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
UDEC
Mining
Universal distinct element code for mining analysis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all; UDEC the UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, UDEC covers Distinct element modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which RPMGlobal XPAC and UDEC actually diverge.
| Attribute | RPMGlobal XPAC | UDEC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Windows, Linux |
| Founded | 1995 | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- Vulcan
- MineSched
- Whittle
Only in UDEC
- Distinct element modeling
- Joint network modeling
- Block interaction analysis
- Support interaction
- Dynamic analysis
- FLAC3D
- 3DEC
- Leapfrog
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot UDEC
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot UDEC
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot UDEC
UDEC
- Geotechnical engineering simulationsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Discrete element modeling and analysisnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Mining and tunneling software analysisnot RPMGlobal XPAC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
UDEC
- The UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Fluid Flow, Barton-Bandis joint analysis, Creep, Thermal and User Defined Models are optional add ons charged on top of the base licence
- Writing custom constitutive models requires the separately licensed UDM option and C++ programming
- Purchases through the Buy Now route are prepaid annual subscriptions rather than a permanent licence
Pricing, plan by plan
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
UDEC
On request- UDEC Professional$19000/year
- Distinct element analysis
- Joint modeling
- Block interaction
Which should you pick?
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Choose UDEC if
- You need distinct element modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want joint network modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is RPMGlobal XPAC or UDEC better?
- Neither clearly leads. RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and UDEC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, RPMGlobal XPAC or UDEC?
- RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and UDEC at On request.
- Does RPMGlobal XPAC or UDEC run on more platforms?
- RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web. UDEC runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is RPMGlobal XPAC best used for?
- RPMGlobal XPAC is most often used for midterm and strategic mine production scheduling, building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data, comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operations. Of those, midterm and strategic mine production scheduling and building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data are not what UDEC is typically brought in for.
- What can RPMGlobal XPAC do that UDEC cannot?
- RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. UDEC covers Distinct element modeling, Joint network modeling, Block interaction analysis, Support interaction. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
UDEC: How much does UDEC cost?
UDEC pricing is not published on the product page. The vendor directs inquiries through an 'Ask an Expert' contact option at [email protected] or a 'Request a Quote' option through the itascasoftware.com store.
SourceUDEC: What is UDEC's pricing model?
UDEC is available through a subscription model rather than one-time licensing. Prepaid annual subscriptions are available through the software store, and pricing is customized based on quote requests.
SourceRelated pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Other head to heads
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineRP
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PCBC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs K-MINE
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MinePlan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs OptiMine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineSched
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Whittle
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs GeoStudio
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PLAXIS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Geoscience ANALYST
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs IHS Markit Petra
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Snowden Supervisor
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Wenco
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Seequent Central
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs RS2
- UDEC vs Deswik Suite
- UDEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- UDEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- UDEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- UDEC vs MineRP
- UDEC vs PCBC
- UDEC vs K-MINE
- UDEC vs MinePlan
- UDEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- UDEC vs Minemax
- UDEC vs Vulcan
- UDEC vs OptiMine
- UDEC vs Promine
- UDEC vs MineSched
- UDEC vs Whittle
- UDEC vs Surpac
- UDEC vs GeoStudio
- UDEC vs PLAXIS
- UDEC vs Datamine
- UDEC vs Geoscience ANALYST
- UDEC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- UDEC vs IHS Markit Petra
- UDEC vs Snowden Supervisor
- UDEC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- UDEC vs Wenco
- UDEC vs Seequent Central
- UDEC vs RS2
