Mining · head to head
3DEC vs RPMGlobal XPAC

RPMGlobal XPAC
Mining
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | 3DEC | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 1981 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Python
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot 3DEC
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot 3DEC
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- 3DEC starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3DEC: Does 3DEC offer a free trial before purchasing?
Yes, 3DEC provides a free demo download available via the REQUEST DEMO button on their website. However, the specific trial period length is not stated on the product page.
Source3DEC: What licensing models does 3DEC support?
3DEC offers both subscription-based licenses (annual) and perpetual licenses. Subscription licenses are available through their FastSpring store with annual subscription terms.
Source3DEC: How is 3DEC pricing determined?
3DEC uses a quote-based pricing model rather than publishing fixed rates. Customers can request a quote through the website or purchase through their software store, with pricing customized based on specific needs.
Source3DEC: What support resources are included with 3DEC?
3DEC includes documentation, tutorials, forum access, FAQs, applied examples, and training courses. Support appears to be included with purchases rather than sold separately.
SourceRelated pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs OptiMine
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- 3DEC vs PLAXIS
- 3DEC vs RS2
- 3DEC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- 3DEC vs Wenco
- 3DEC vs Snowden Supervisor
- 3DEC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- 3DEC vs Seequent Central
- 3DEC vs GeoStudio
- 3DEC vs Whittle
- 3DEC vs MineRP
- 3DEC vs PCBC
- 3DEC vs K-MINE
- 3DEC vs MinePlan
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs MineSched
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs OptiMine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maptek I-Site
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PLAXIS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs RS2
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Wenco
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Snowden Supervisor
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Seequent Central
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs GeoStudio
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Whittle
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineRP
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PCBC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs K-MINE
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MinePlan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineSched
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
