Software · head to head
3DEC vs RPMGlobal XPAC

RPMGlobal XPAC
Software
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | 3DEC | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 1981 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Python
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot 3DEC
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot 3DEC
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- 3DEC starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does 3DEC or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.
Related pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs Datamine
- 3DEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- 3DEC vs Trimble Mining
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Carlson Mining
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maptek I-Site
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Trimble Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Carlson Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Cority EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS
