Software · head to head
Make vs Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
Software
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Make free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month; Microsoft Power Automate free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- They diverge on capability: Make covers Visual workflow builder, Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Make and Microsoft Power Automate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Make | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Cloud, Desktop |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Make
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- API connectors
- Conditional logic
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
Only in Microsoft Power Automate
- Automated flows
- Instant flows
- Scheduled flows
- Desktop automation
- Process mining
- Business process flows
- Approval workflows
- 500+ connectors
Both cover
- Custom APIs
- Microsoft 365
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Make
- Automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applicationsnot Microsoft Power Automate
- Building AI agents and workflow automation without extensive codingnot Microsoft Power Automate
- Enterprise automation with GDPR, SOC 2 Type II compliancenot Microsoft Power Automate
- Rapid deployment of automations from concept to livenot Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
- Workflow Automationnot Make
- Data Integrationnot Make
- Process Automationnot Make
- App Integrationnot Make
- API Connectivitynot Make
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Make
- Free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- Free tier restricted to 2 active scenarios maximum
- Free tier enforces 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Credit-based model means costs scale with usage volume, not just features
Microsoft Power Automate
- Free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Not suitable for long-running workflows; can fail unexpectedly without warning
- Limited to simple linear logic; fails with complex workflows involving multiple stakeholders
- Tasks cannot automate at scale when requiring more than approximately 60 users
Pricing, plan by plan
Make
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Make review.
Microsoft Power Automate
Free- FreeFree
- 750 flow runs/month
- Standard connectors only
- Basic cloud flows
- Premium$15/user/month
- Cloud flows (DPA)
- Attended RPA
- 250 MB Dataverse database
- Process$150/bot/month
- Unattended automation
- Cloud and desktop flows
- 50 MB Dataverse database
- Hosted Process$215/bot/month
- Microsoft-managed virtual machine
- Unattended automation
- Same Dataverse entitlements as Process plan
Which should you pick?
Choose Make if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want webhooks.
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if
- You need automated flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- You also want instant flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Make or Microsoft Power Automate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Make starts at Free and Microsoft Power Automate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Make or Microsoft Power Automate?
- Make starts at Free and Microsoft Power Automate at Free.
- Does Make or Microsoft Power Automate run on more platforms?
- Make runs on Web. Microsoft Power Automate runs on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- Can I use Make for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Make best used for?
- Make is most often used for automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications, building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding, enterprise automation with gdpr, soc 2 type ii compliance, rapid deployment of automations from concept to live. Of those, automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications and building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding are not what Microsoft Power Automate is typically brought in for.
- What can Make do that Microsoft Power Automate cannot?
- Make covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, API connectors, Conditional logic. Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Instant flows, Scheduled flows, Desktop automation. Both handle Custom APIs, Microsoft 365, Salesforce.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Power Automate: Is Power Automate included with Microsoft 365?
Yes. If you have an eligible Microsoft 365 subscription, you can use Power Automate at no extra cost for flows relying only on standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams). Premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle) require paid plans.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: How many flow runs are allowed on the free plan?
Power Automate's free tier (included with Microsoft 365) is limited to 750 flow runs per month and standard connectors only. Out of 900+ total connectors, the free plan only includes Microsoft ecosystem apps and limited third-party apps.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: What's the difference between Premium and Process plans?
Premium ($15/user/month) provides attended automation with cloud flows and standard RPA. Process plan ($150/bot/month) enables unattended automation where bots run without human intervention on virtual machines for high-volume, repetitive tasks.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: Does Power Automate support long-running workflows?
No. Power Automate is not suitable for long-lasting workflows because they can run without warning and fail unexpectedly. The platform is built for linear, branching logic (if-then) rather than complex, multi-step business processes involving multiple stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Power Automate
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Make vs HubSpot CRM
- Make vs Fireflies.ai
- Make vs Gather
- Make vs IFTTT
- Make vs Otter.ai
- Make vs tl;dv
- Make vs Vidyard
- Make vs ConnectWise
- Make vs Grain
- Make vs Kaseya VSA
- Make vs Krisp
- Make vs Mmhmm
- Make vs Monday Sales CRM
- Make vs Mural
- Make vs N-able N-central
- Make vs Pop
- Make vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Make vs Splashtop
- Make vs n8n
- Make vs Zapier
- Make vs MuleSoft
- Make vs Parabola
- Make vs Zapier Plus
- Make vs Jitterbit
- Make vs mParticle
- Make vs Paragon
- Make vs RudderStack
- Make vs Workato
- Make vs Airbyte
- Make vs Automate.io
- Make vs Boomi
- Make vs Browser Use
- Make vs Browserbase
- Make vs Celigo
- Make vs Census
- Make vs CrewAI
- Microsoft Power Automate vs HubSpot CRM
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Fireflies.ai
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Gather
- Microsoft Power Automate vs IFTTT
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Otter.ai
- Microsoft Power Automate vs tl;dv
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Vidyard
- Microsoft Power Automate vs ConnectWise
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Grain
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Kaseya VSA
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Krisp
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Mmhmm
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Monday Sales CRM
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Mural
- Microsoft Power Automate vs N-able N-central
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Pop
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Splashtop
- Microsoft Power Automate vs n8n
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier
- Microsoft Power Automate vs MuleSoft
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Parabola
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier Plus
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Jitterbit
- Microsoft Power Automate vs mParticle
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Paragon
- Microsoft Power Automate vs RudderStack
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Airbyte
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Automate.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Boomi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browser Use
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browserbase
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Celigo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Census
- Microsoft Power Automate vs CrewAI

