Software · head to head
Make vs Paragon
The short version
- Only Make has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Make free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- They diverge on capability: Make covers Visual workflow builder, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Make and Paragon actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Make
- Visual workflow builder
- API connectors
- Conditional logic
- Data transformation
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
- Custom APIs
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- 500+ apps
- Custom integrations
- HubSpot
Both cover
- Webhooks
- Error handling
- Webhooks
- Salesforce
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Make
- Automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applicationsnot Paragon
- Building AI agents and workflow automation without extensive codingnot Paragon
- Enterprise automation with GDPR, SOC 2 Type II compliancenot Paragon
- Rapid deployment of automations from concept to livenot Paragon
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Make
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Make
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Make
- Free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- Free tier restricted to 2 active scenarios maximum
- Free tier enforces 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Credit-based model means costs scale with usage volume, not just features
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Make
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Make review.
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Make if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want api connectors.
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Make or Paragon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Make starts at Free and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Make or Paragon?
- Make has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Make and $299/month for Paragon.
- Does Make or Paragon run on more platforms?
- Make runs on Web. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
- Can I use Make for free?
- Yes. Make has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paragon starts at $299/month.
- What is Make best used for?
- Make is most often used for automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications, building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding, enterprise automation with gdpr, soc 2 type ii compliance, rapid deployment of automations from concept to live. Of those, automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications and building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
- What can Make do that Paragon cannot?
- Make covers Visual workflow builder, API connectors, Conditional logic, Data transformation. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Monitoring. Both handle Webhooks, Error handling, Webhooks, Salesforce.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Make vs HubSpot CRM
- Make vs Fireflies.ai
- Make vs Gather
- Make vs IFTTT
- Make vs Otter.ai
- Make vs tl;dv
- Make vs Vidyard
- Make vs ConnectWise
- Make vs Grain
- Make vs Kaseya VSA
- Make vs Krisp
- Make vs Mmhmm
- Make vs Monday Sales CRM
- Make vs Mural
- Make vs N-able N-central
- Make vs Pop
- Make vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Make vs Splashtop
- Make vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Make vs n8n
- Make vs Zapier
- Make vs MuleSoft
- Make vs Parabola
- Make vs Zapier Plus
- Make vs Jitterbit
- Make vs mParticle
- Make vs RudderStack
- Make vs Workato
- Make vs Airbyte
- Make vs Automate.io
- Make vs Boomi
- Make vs Browser Use
- Make vs Browserbase
- Make vs Celigo
- Make vs Census
- Make vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs HubSpot CRM
- Paragon vs Fireflies.ai
- Paragon vs Gather
- Paragon vs IFTTT
- Paragon vs Otter.ai
- Paragon vs tl;dv
- Paragon vs Vidyard
- Paragon vs ConnectWise
- Paragon vs Grain
- Paragon vs Kaseya VSA
- Paragon vs Krisp
- Paragon vs Mmhmm
- Paragon vs Monday Sales CRM
- Paragon vs Mural
- Paragon vs N-able N-central
- Paragon vs Pop
- Paragon vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Paragon vs Splashtop
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI


