APIs · head to head
Kong vs Terragrunt

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Terragrunt
- API development and testingnot Terragrunt
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Kong
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Kong
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Terragrunt?
- Kong starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Kong or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Pulumi
- Kong vs Infracost
- Kong vs Packer
- Kong vs Serverless Framework
- Kong vs SST
- Kong vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Kong vs Cerebrium
- Kong vs Go
- Kong vs Rancher
- Kong vs Anyscale
- Kong vs Linkerd
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure
- Kong vs Nitric
- Kong vs OpenEBS
- Kong vs OVHcloud
- Kong vs Nomad
- Kong vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Convoy
- Terragrunt vs PocketBase
- Terragrunt vs Appwrite
- Terragrunt vs Hasura
- Terragrunt vs Sanity
- Terragrunt vs Tyk
- Terragrunt vs WSO2 API Manager
- Terragrunt vs Gravitee
- Terragrunt vs Janus Gateway
- Terragrunt vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Terragrunt vs 3scale
- Terragrunt vs Akana
- Terragrunt vs Enable Banking
- Terragrunt vs Flybits
- Terragrunt vs i2c
- Terragrunt vs KeystoneJS
- Terragrunt vs Liveblocks
- Terragrunt vs Moesif
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant

