APIs · head to head
Kong vs Vagrant
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Vagrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2010).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Docker support
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Both cover
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Vagrant
- API development and testingnot Vagrant
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Kong
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Kong
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Vagrant?
- Kong starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Kong or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Vagrant cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Both handle Linux support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceVagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceVagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs DigitalOcean
- Kong vs Neon
- Kong vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Kong vs Grafana Cloud
- Kong vs Pulumi
- Kong vs Portworx
- Kong vs Serverless Framework
- Kong vs Podman
- Kong vs Caddy
- Kong vs Rancher
- Kong vs Infracost
- Kong vs Porter
- Kong vs SST
- Kong vs Tencent Cloud
- Kong vs Terragrunt
- Kong vs Thanos
- Kong vs Zeabur
- Kong vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs Convoy
- Vagrant vs PocketBase
- Vagrant vs Appwrite
- Vagrant vs Hasura
- Vagrant vs Sanity
- Vagrant vs Tyk
- Vagrant vs WSO2 API Manager
- Vagrant vs Gravitee
- Vagrant vs Janus Gateway
- Vagrant vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Vagrant vs 3scale
- Vagrant vs Akana
- Vagrant vs Enable Banking
- Vagrant vs Flybits
- Vagrant vs i2c
- Vagrant vs KeystoneJS
- Vagrant vs Liveblocks
- Vagrant vs Moesif
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin


