Cloud · head to head
OpenEBS vs Terragrunt

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenEBS there is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenEBS and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenEBS | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux | AWS, Azure, GCP |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenEBS
- Replicated engine
- Local PV engines
- Kubernetes-native management
- Snapshots and clones
- No licence fee
- Hardware independence
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenEBS
- Running Cassandra or Kafka on Kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficientnot Terragrunt
- A platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal Kubernetes without a per node subscriptionnot Terragrunt
- An edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justifiednot Terragrunt
- Replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a Container Storage Interface drivernot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot OpenEBS
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot OpenEBS
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot OpenEBS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenEBS
- There is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- The project has several storage engines with different maturity and different operational characteristics, and choosing the wrong one for your workload produces poor results that look like a product failure.
- Documentation and upgrade guidance assume real Kubernetes storage knowledge, so teams without that expertise underestimate the operational load they are taking on.
- Project governance shifted after DataCore acquired MayaData in 2021, which means the direction of a supposedly neutral project is influenced by one commercial sponsor.
- Disaster recovery, cross-cluster replication and policy-driven data services are thinner than in the commercial alternatives, so organisations with those requirements end up building them or buying a product anyway.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenEBS
Free- OpenEBSFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All storage engines included
- No node or capacity limits
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenEBS if
- You need replicated engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want local pv engines.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenEBS or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenEBS starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenEBS or Terragrunt?
- OpenEBS starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does OpenEBS or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- OpenEBS runs on Linux. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use OpenEBS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenEBS best used for?
- OpenEBS is most often used for running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient, a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription, an edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justified, replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a container storage interface driver. Of those, running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient and a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenEBS do that Terragrunt cannot?
- OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Local PV engines, Kubernetes-native management, Snapshots and clones. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenEBS: Who supports it in production?
The project is community supported. Commercial support is available from DataCore, which acquired the original sponsor MayaData in 2021. Establish that relationship before production, not during an incident.
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceOpenEBS: Which engine should we use?
If your application replicates its own data, use a Local engine and avoid replicating twice. If it does not, such as with PostgreSQL, use the Replicated engine.
Terragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceOpenEBS: Does it cost anything?
No licence fee. The cost is operational, and a support contract if you want someone accountable.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenEBS vs Portworx
- OpenEBS vs Rancher
- OpenEBS vs Longhorn
- OpenEBS vs DigitalOcean
- OpenEBS vs Podman
- OpenEBS vs Qovery
- OpenEBS vs Caddy
- OpenEBS vs Cerebrium
- OpenEBS vs DeepInfra
- OpenEBS vs Go
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox VE
- OpenEBS vs K3s
- OpenEBS vs Rook
- OpenEBS vs containerd
- OpenEBS vs minikube
- OpenEBS vs Cilium
- OpenEBS vs Flux
- OpenEBS vs Linkerd
- OpenEBS vs Pulumi
- OpenEBS vs Infracost
- OpenEBS vs Packer
- OpenEBS vs Serverless Framework
- OpenEBS vs SST
- OpenEBS vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- OpenEBS vs Anyscale
- OpenEBS vs Microsoft Azure
- OpenEBS vs Nitric
- OpenEBS vs OVHcloud
- OpenEBS vs Nomad
- OpenEBS vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Portworx
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Longhorn
- Terragrunt vs DigitalOcean
- Terragrunt vs Podman
- Terragrunt vs Qovery
- Terragrunt vs Caddy
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs DeepInfra
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Proxmox VE
- Terragrunt vs K3s
- Terragrunt vs Rook
- Terragrunt vs containerd
- Terragrunt vs minikube
- Terragrunt vs Cilium
- Terragrunt vs Flux
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant

