Cloud · head to head
Nomad vs Terragrunt

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nomad nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Nomad covers Container orchestration, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nomad and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Nomad | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nomad
- Container orchestration
- Job scheduling
- Multi-cloud support
- Auto-scaling
- Service discovery
- Rolling deployments
- Monitoring integration
- High availability
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nomad
- Container and workload orchestration across infrastructurenot Terragrunt
- Multi-region application deploymentnot Terragrunt
- Flexible scheduling for batch jobs and servicesnot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Nomad
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Nomad
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Nomad
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nomad
- Nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Nomad to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions
- Each version converts to MPL 2.0 only four years after that version is published
- Resource quotas, Sentinel policies and audit logging sit in a Governance and Policy add-on module that is separate from the Enterprise base platform package
- Multi-region deployments, multiple Vault namespaces and Nomad Autopilot advanced server management require Nomad Enterprise
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Nomad
Free- Open SourceFree
- Workload orchestration
- Multi-cloud
- Flexible scheduling
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Nomad if
- You need container orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want job scheduling.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Nomad or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nomad starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nomad or Terragrunt?
- Nomad starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Nomad or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Nomad runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Nomad for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nomad best used for?
- Nomad is most often used for container and workload orchestration across infrastructure, multi-region application deployment, flexible scheduling for batch jobs and services. Of those, container and workload orchestration across infrastructure and multi-region application deployment are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Nomad do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Nomad covers Container orchestration, Job scheduling, Multi-cloud support, Auto-scaling. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nomad: Is HashiCorp Nomad free?
HashiCorp Nomad is open source and free to use. Commercial enterprise support and hosting options may be available through HashiCorp, but the core product is free.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceNomad: Does HashiCorp Nomad have a pricing model?
Nomad is open source software with no published pricing tiers. HashiCorp offers commercial hosting and support for their products on a usage-based or custom pricing model, but Nomad itself is free to download and deploy.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceNomad: What is HashiCorp's pricing model for enterprise Nomad?
HashiCorp offers flexible pricing for enterprise Nomad support including pay-as-you-go (PAYG) billing with no long-term commitment, flex plans with preferred pricing, and enterprise self-managed plans. Contact HashiCorp sales for custom quotes.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Nomad vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Nomad vs DigitalOcean
- Nomad vs Grafana Cloud
- Nomad vs Neon
- Nomad vs Microsoft Azure
- Nomad vs Crossplane
- Nomad vs Encore
- Nomad vs Zeabur
- Nomad vs Hetzner Cloud
- Nomad vs Linode
- Nomad vs Vultr
- Nomad vs Lambda
- Nomad vs Longhorn
- Nomad vs Northflank
- Nomad vs minikube
- Nomad vs OpenTelemetry
- Nomad vs Pulumi
- Nomad vs Infracost
- Nomad vs Packer
- Nomad vs Serverless Framework
- Nomad vs SST
- Nomad vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Nomad vs Cerebrium
- Nomad vs Go
- Nomad vs Rancher
- Nomad vs Anyscale
- Nomad vs Linkerd
- Nomad vs Nitric
- Nomad vs OpenEBS
- Nomad vs OVHcloud
- Nomad vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Terragrunt vs DigitalOcean
- Terragrunt vs Grafana Cloud
- Terragrunt vs Neon
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Crossplane
- Terragrunt vs Encore
- Terragrunt vs Zeabur
- Terragrunt vs Hetzner Cloud
- Terragrunt vs Linode
- Terragrunt vs Vultr
- Terragrunt vs Lambda
- Terragrunt vs Longhorn
- Terragrunt vs Northflank
- Terragrunt vs minikube
- Terragrunt vs OpenTelemetry
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant

