Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Endgame vs Koncert

Endgame logo

Endgame

Sales Enablement

A context graph over CRM, calls and documents that answers account questions with citations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Koncert logo

Koncert

Sales Enablement

Four separate diallers, including agent-assisted calling, for outbound teams that live on the phone

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Endgame there is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.; Koncert pricing is not published; the pricing page shows placeholder numbers rather than real rates and directs you to sales, which makes it impossible to compare cost per seat against Orum or Nooks without entering a sales cycle.
  • They diverge on capability: Endgame covers Context graph, Koncert covers AI Parallel Dialer.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Endgame and Koncert actually diverge.

Attributes where Endgame and Koncert differ
AttributeEndgameKoncert
PlatformsWebWeb, API

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Endgame

  • Context graph
  • Cited answers
  • Account research briefs
  • Meeting and call prep
  • Deal inspection
  • Stakeholder mapping
  • Executive and QBR briefings
  • MCP server

Only in Koncert

  • AI Parallel Dialer
  • AI Flow Dialer
  • Agent-Assisted Dialer
  • Click Dialer
  • Local presence
  • Caller ID health monitoring
  • Remote Coach
  • Remote Salesfloor

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Endgame

  • An enterprise sales team on Salesforce and Gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day.not Koncert
  • A revenue organisation that has standardised on Claude or ChatGPT internally and wants those assistants grounded in real CRM and call data instead of hallucinating account history.not Koncert
  • A sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across Salesforce, Snowflake, Gong and Notion.not Koncert
  • A new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.not Koncert

Koncert

  • A sales development team selling into enterprises where decision makers sit behind switchboards and a software dialler alone cannot reach themnot Endgame
  • An outbound organisation whose numbers are being flagged as spam and which needs caller ID health monitoring and rotation as a managed capabilitynot Endgame
  • A distributed sales team that has lost the ambient pressure of a shared calling floor and wants Remote Salesfloor to recreate itnot Endgame
  • A team that wants to run different dialler modes for different segments, parallel for volume lists and click-to-call for named accountsnot Endgame

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Endgame

  • There is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
  • The product has pivoted twice, from product-led sales signals to account intelligence to a GTM context graph, on a Series B raised in February 2022 with no publicly reported round since, which is real roadmap and data model risk on a multi-year contract.
  • Value depends heavily on Salesforce and Gong depth, so organisations on HubSpot or a different call recorder get a substantially thinner graph and a weaker product for the same negotiation.
  • Positioning as a context layer under other AI tools makes return on investment hard to attribute, because no user logs in and no workflow visibly belongs to it, which makes renewal conversations difficult to defend internally.
  • Vendor-published performance claims around accuracy, speed and cost reduction have no third-party benchmark behind them, and the independent review profile has been effectively inactive for over a year, so there is no current corpus to validate against.
  • As a layer rather than an application it is structurally exposed to Salesforce or Gong shipping equivalent native context, which would remove the reason to keep paying for it without any action on the vendor’s part.

Koncert

  • Pricing is not published; the pricing page shows placeholder numbers rather than real rates and directs you to sales, which makes it impossible to compare cost per seat against Orum or Nooks without entering a sales cycle.
  • Parallel dialling connects representatives so fast that they arrive on a live call with no time to recall prior context, and reviewers report this pushes reps onto a rigid script and degrades conversation quality even as dial volume rises.
  • Koncert supplies TCPA-supporting features but not legal cover, and parallel and agent-assisted dialling attract regulatory attention in several jurisdictions, so the compliance burden and any liability stay with your organisation.
  • Selling four dialler products rather than one means the capability you evaluated may not be the one you bought, and switching modes or mixing them across a team frequently involves renegotiating the contract.
  • The agent-assisted dialler bills for human labour rather than software seats, so its cost scales with call volume rather than headcount and can rise sharply during a campaign push in a way a per-seat budget does not anticipate.

Pricing, plan by plan

Endgame

On request
  • Endgame$undefined/year
    • Context graph across CRM, calls, documents and email
    • Slack, Teams, web and CLI access
    • MCP server for external assistants

Koncert

On request
  • Koncert$undefined/year
    • AI Parallel Dialer
    • AI Flow Dialer
    • Agent-Assisted Dialer

Which should you pick?

Choose Endgame if

  • You need context graph.
  • You also want cited answers.
Endgame review

Choose Koncert if

  • You need ai parallel dialer.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want ai flow dialer.
Koncert review

Questions people ask

Is Endgame or Koncert better?
Neither clearly leads. Endgame starts at On request and Koncert at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Endgame or Koncert?
Endgame starts at On request and Koncert at On request.
Does Endgame or Koncert run on more platforms?
Endgame runs on Web. Koncert runs on Web, API.
What is Endgame best used for?
Endgame is most often used for an enterprise sales team on salesforce and gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day., a revenue organisation that has standardised on claude or chatgpt internally and wants those assistants grounded in real crm and call data instead of hallucinating account history., a sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across salesforce, snowflake, gong and notion., a new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.. Of those, an enterprise sales team on salesforce and gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day. and a revenue organisation that has standardised on claude or chatgpt internally and wants those assistants grounded in real crm and call data instead of hallucinating account history. are not what Koncert is typically brought in for.
What can Endgame do that Koncert cannot?
Endgame covers Context graph, Cited answers, Account research briefs, Meeting and call prep. Koncert covers AI Parallel Dialer, AI Flow Dialer, Agent-Assisted Dialer, Click Dialer.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Endgame: Is this the Endgame that Elastic acquired?

No. That was an endpoint security company. This is Endgame, Inc. at endgame.io, an account intelligence and context platform for revenue teams.

Koncert: What is Koncert previously called?

ConnectLeader. The company rebranded to Koncert while retaining the same dialler technology lineage.

Endgame: Is it still the product-led sales signals tool?

No. It pivoted twice. If your shortlist came from 2021 to 2023 coverage of PQL scoring, the product you would buy today is different.

Koncert: What is the agent-assisted dialler?

Human agents place calls and navigate gatekeepers, phone trees and receptionists, connecting your representative only when a live decision maker is on the line.

Endgame: What does it cost?

Unpublished. There is no pricing page. Expect an enterprise annual contract negotiated per deal.

Koncert: Is pricing published?

No. The pricing page shows placeholder figures and directs visitors to contact sales for a quote scoped by dialler type and seat count.

Endgame: Do I need Salesforce and Gong?

Not strictly, but the graph is built around them. On HubSpot or with another call recorder you get materially less value for the same price.

Koncert: Is parallel dialling legally safe?

Koncert provides TCPA-supporting features and holds SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance, but the calling organisation remains responsible for regulatory compliance in each jurisdiction it dials into.

Share

Related pages

More on Endgame

More on Koncert

Keep looking

Other head to heads