Cloud · head to head
kind vs Passbolt

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: kind requires Docker or Podman, so it inherits whatever container runtime limitations exist on the host; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: kind covers Nodes as containers, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which kind and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in kind
- Nodes as containers
- Multi-node topologies
- CI-friendly
- Local image loading
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
kind
- Spinning up and destroying a Kubernetes cluster inside a CI jobnot Passbolt
- Testing controllers and operators against several Kubernetes versionsnot Passbolt
- Local multi-node clusters without the memory cost of virtual machinesnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot kind
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot kind
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot kind
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot kind
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
kind
- Requires Docker or Podman, so it inherits whatever container runtime limitations exist on the host
- Fewer conveniences than minikube: no addon system, so ingress and metrics need manual installation
- Because nodes are containers sharing the host kernel, it is a weaker simulation of real node behaviour and storage
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
kind
Free- kindFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose kind if
- You need nodes as containers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want multi-node topologies.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is kind or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. kind starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, kind or Passbolt?
- kind starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does kind or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- kind runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use kind for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is kind best used for?
- kind is most often used for spinning up and destroying a kubernetes cluster inside a ci job, testing controllers and operators against several kubernetes versions, local multi-node clusters without the memory cost of virtual machines. Of those, spinning up and destroying a kubernetes cluster inside a ci job and testing controllers and operators against several kubernetes versions are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can kind do that Passbolt cannot?
- kind covers Nodes as containers, Multi-node topologies, CI-friendly, Local image loading. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
kind: Is kind free?
Yes, open source and maintained under Kubernetes SIGs.
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
Sourcekind: Why run Kubernetes nodes as containers?
Speed and cost. A container node starts in seconds and uses far less memory than a virtual machine, which is what makes per-CI-run clusters realistic.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
Sourcekind: Is kind suitable for production?
No. It is a development and testing tool, and node isolation is weaker than real nodes because containers share the host kernel.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- kind vs Podman
- kind vs K3s
- kind vs Qovery
- kind vs DigitalOcean
- kind vs Portworx
- kind vs Crossplane
- kind vs OpenEBS
- kind vs Scaleway
- kind vs Proxmox VE
- kind vs CapRover
- kind vs Alibaba Cloud
- kind vs Chef
- kind vs Contabo
- kind vs Coolify
- kind vs Buildah
- kind vs Rancher
- kind vs Bitwarden
- kind vs LastPass
- kind vs authentik
- kind vs 1Password
- kind vs Authelia
- kind vs Enpass
- kind vs HashiCorp Vault
- kind vs Infisical
- kind vs Norton 360
- kind vs Semgrep
- kind vs Trivy
- kind vs Chainguard
- kind vs Trulioo
- kind vs Unit21
- kind vs Veracode
- kind vs Very Good Security
- kind vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- kind vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Podman
- Passbolt vs K3s
- Passbolt vs Qovery
- Passbolt vs DigitalOcean
- Passbolt vs Portworx
- Passbolt vs Crossplane
- Passbolt vs OpenEBS
- Passbolt vs Scaleway
- Passbolt vs Proxmox VE
- Passbolt vs CapRover
- Passbolt vs Alibaba Cloud
- Passbolt vs Chef
- Passbolt vs Contabo
- Passbolt vs Coolify
- Passbolt vs Buildah
- Passbolt vs Rancher
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe

