Cybersecurity · head to head
Passbolt vs Rancher

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.; Rancher another platform to run and keep available, and an outage in it affects access to everything it manages
- They diverge on capability: Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Rancher covers Multi-cluster management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Passbolt and Rancher actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
Only in Rancher
- Multi-cluster management
- Centralised RBAC
- Cluster provisioning
- App catalogue
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Rancher
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Rancher
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Rancher
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Rancher
Rancher
- Operating many Kubernetes clusters with consistent access controlnot Passbolt
- Managing clusters across more than one cloud provider from one interfacenot Passbolt
- Edge deployments with many small clusters, typically alongside K3snot Passbolt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Rancher
- Another platform to run and keep available, and an outage in it affects access to everything it manages
- Meaningful overhead if you only operate one or two clusters
- Version compatibility between Rancher and managed Kubernetes versions needs watching during upgrades
- Support requires a SUSE subscription; the project itself is community-supported
Pricing, plan by plan
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Rancher
Free- RancherFree
- Full functionality
- No data limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Choose Rancher if
- You need multi-cluster management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want centralised rbac.
Questions people ask
- Is Passbolt or Rancher better?
- Neither clearly leads. Passbolt starts at Free and Rancher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Passbolt or Rancher?
- Passbolt starts at Free and Rancher at Free.
- Does Passbolt or Rancher run on more platforms?
- Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. Rancher runs on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Passbolt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Passbolt best used for?
- Passbolt is most often used for self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty, provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory, sharing credentials across engineering or it teams via folders and groups, automating credential retrieval through the cli or open api. Of those, self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty and provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory are not what Rancher is typically brought in for.
- What can Passbolt do that Rancher cannot?
- Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API. Rancher covers Multi-cluster management, Centralised RBAC, Cluster provisioning, App catalogue.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceRancher: Is Rancher free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee. SUSE sells support subscriptions.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceRancher: Does Rancher work with EKS and GKE?
Yes. It imports and manages existing clusters regardless of who provisioned them, alongside clusters it creates itself.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRancher: Do I need Rancher for one cluster?
Generally no. Its value appears when cluster count and consistent access control become the problem, which is not the case with one.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Portworx
- Passbolt vs OpenEBS
- Passbolt vs Pulumi
- Passbolt vs Podman
- Passbolt vs Flux
- Passbolt vs Packer
- Passbolt vs Beam Cloud
- Passbolt vs Porter
- Passbolt vs Zeabur
- Passbolt vs DeepInfra
- Passbolt vs Go
- Passbolt vs Proxmox VE
- Passbolt vs Upstash
- Passbolt vs Azure Functions
- Passbolt vs Deno Deploy
- Passbolt vs Kustomize
- Passbolt vs minikube
- Passbolt vs kind
- Rancher vs Bitwarden
- Rancher vs LastPass
- Rancher vs authentik
- Rancher vs 1Password
- Rancher vs Authelia
- Rancher vs Enpass
- Rancher vs HashiCorp Vault
- Rancher vs Infisical
- Rancher vs Norton 360
- Rancher vs Semgrep
- Rancher vs Trivy
- Rancher vs Chainguard
- Rancher vs Trulioo
- Rancher vs Unit21
- Rancher vs Veracode
- Rancher vs Very Good Security
- Rancher vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rancher vs Windscribe
- Rancher vs Portworx
- Rancher vs OpenEBS
- Rancher vs Pulumi
- Rancher vs Podman
- Rancher vs Flux
- Rancher vs Packer
- Rancher vs Beam Cloud
- Rancher vs Porter
- Rancher vs Zeabur
- Rancher vs DeepInfra
- Rancher vs Go
- Rancher vs Proxmox VE
- Rancher vs Upstash
- Rancher vs Azure Functions
- Rancher vs Deno Deploy
- Rancher vs Kustomize
- Rancher vs minikube
- Rancher vs kind

