Accounting · head to head
Karbon vs Medius

Medius
Accounting
Accounts payable automation and supplier payments for mid-market finance teams, Marlin Equity owned
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Karbon monthly billing option only available for teams of 4 or more users; Medius the sourcing, contract and procurement modules are considerably less developed than the AP core, so buying Medius as a full source-to-pay suite means accepting weak upstream tooling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Karbon and Medius actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Karbon
Nothing recorded that Medius does not also cover.
Only in Medius
- Invoice capture and coding
- Matching and exception handling
- Fraud and anomaly detection
- Supplier payments
- Approval workflow
- ERP integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Karbon
- Automating client document collection for tax practice intakenot Medius
- Tracking all client requests in workflows tied to jobsnot Medius
- Aligning hours worked with billable time per engagementnot Medius
- Automating period close by connecting practice management to accountingnot Medius
- Streamlining client document submission and approval workflowsnot Medius
Medius
- A mid-market finance team where most spend arrives as an invoice with no purchase order to match againstnot Karbon
- A group with several legal entities on different ERPs that wants one AP process across all of themnot Karbon
- Reducing invoice fraud exposure with automated detection of supplier bank detail changesnot Karbon
- Replacing a scanning bureau and a shared AP inbox with automated capture and exception-based reviewnot Karbon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Karbon
- Monthly billing option only available for teams of 4 or more users
- Team plan at $59/month per user minimum cost may be expensive for smaller practices
- No seat license discounts published; scaling costs linearly with user count
Medius
- The sourcing, contract and procurement modules are considerably less developed than the AP core, so buying Medius as a full source-to-pay suite means accepting weak upstream tooling.
- Pricing is quote-only and driven by invoice volume, so a business with many low-value invoices pays disproportionately relative to the spend being controlled.
- Payments are billed on transaction volume separately from the AP subscription, which is easy to omit from a cost comparison against a licence-only AP tool.
- Private equity ownership since 2017 has produced an acquisition-driven product line, so payments and adjacent capability come from bought-in technology rather than the original platform.
- ERP integration depth varies sharply by system, and organisations on less common or heavily customised ERPs face integration work that lengthens the implementation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Karbon
$59/month- Team$59/month
- Per-user pricing
- Designed for small accounting firms
- Minimum team size of 4 for monthly billing
- Business$89/month
- Per-user pricing
- Workflow automation
- Integrations for growing practices
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing
- Tailored for large accounting firms
- Dedicated support
Medius
On request- Medius AP Automation$undefined/year
- Two packaged AP automation tiers
- Priced by invoice volume and entity count
- Sourcing, contracts and procurement modules sold separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Karbon if
Nothing in the data separates Karbon from Medius on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Medius if
- You need invoice capture and coding.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want matching and exception handling.
Questions people ask
- Is Karbon or Medius better?
- Neither clearly leads. Karbon starts at $59/month and Medius at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Karbon or Medius?
- Karbon starts at $59/month and Medius at On request.
- Does Karbon or Medius run on more platforms?
- Karbon runs on Web. Medius runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Karbon best used for?
- Karbon is most often used for automating client document collection for tax practice intake, tracking all client requests in workflows tied to jobs, aligning hours worked with billable time per engagement, automating period close by connecting practice management to accounting. Of those, automating client document collection for tax practice intake and tracking all client requests in workflows tied to jobs are not what Medius is typically brought in for.
- What can Karbon do that Medius cannot?
- Medius covers Invoice capture and coding, Matching and exception handling, Fraud and anomaly detection, Supplier payments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Karbon: How much does Karbon cost?
Karbon pricing starts at $59 per user per month (Team plan, billed annually) or $79 per user per month (monthly billing for 4+ users). Business plan is $89/month annual or $99/month monthly. Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceMedius: Is Medius a procurement suite or an AP tool?
Primarily an AP automation platform with procurement modules attached. If sourcing is your main requirement, look elsewhere.
Karbon: Is there a discount for annual billing on Karbon?
Yes, Karbon offers annual billing at a discount compared to monthly. Team plan is $59/month annually versus $79/month monthly. Business plan is $89/month annually versus $99/month monthly.
SourceMedius: Who owns Medius?
Marlin Equity Partners, which acquired it in 2017 and has funded several bolt-on acquisitions since.
Karbon: What is the minimum user requirement for monthly billing on Karbon?
Karbon requires a minimum team size of 4 users to access monthly billing. Teams smaller than 4 must choose annual billing.
SourceMedius: How is it priced?
By quote, driven by invoice volume and entity count, with payments billed separately on transaction volume.
Medius: Does it replace our ERP?
No. It sits alongside the ERP and posts approved invoices into it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Karbon vs Airbase
- Karbon vs Ramp
- Karbon vs QuickBooks
- Karbon vs Melio
- Karbon vs DATEV
- Karbon vs Carta
- Karbon vs Happay
- Karbon vs Money Forward Cloud
- Karbon vs Adyen
- Karbon vs Invoicera
- Karbon vs RazorpayX
- Karbon vs Tropic
- Karbon vs Zuora
- Karbon vs Airwallex
- Karbon vs Bench
- Karbon vs Billin
- Karbon vs Billit
- Karbon vs Bill.com
- Karbon vs Yooz
- Karbon vs Moss
- Karbon vs Ottimate
- Karbon vs Soldo
- Karbon vs Kodo
- Karbon vs Paddle
- Karbon vs Modern Treasury
- Karbon vs Dodo Payments
- Karbon vs Fortnox
- Karbon vs FreeAgent
- Karbon vs freee
- Karbon vs insightsoftware
- Karbon vs IRIS KashFlow
- Medius vs Airbase
- Medius vs Ramp
- Medius vs QuickBooks
- Medius vs Melio
- Medius vs DATEV
- Medius vs Carta
- Medius vs Happay
- Medius vs Money Forward Cloud
- Medius vs Adyen
- Medius vs Invoicera
- Medius vs RazorpayX
- Medius vs Tropic
- Medius vs Zuora
- Medius vs Airwallex
- Medius vs Bench
- Medius vs Billin
- Medius vs Billit
- Medius vs Bill.com
- Medius vs Yooz
- Medius vs Moss
- Medius vs Ottimate
- Medius vs Soldo
- Medius vs Kodo
- Medius vs Paddle
- Medius vs Modern Treasury
- Medius vs Dodo Payments
- Medius vs Fortnox
- Medius vs FreeAgent
- Medius vs freee
- Medius vs insightsoftware
- Medius vs IRIS KashFlow

