Legal · head to head
Intapp vs iubenda
Intapp
Legal
Risk, compliance and business intake software for professional services firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
iubenda
Legal
Published-price privacy compliance: certified consent banner, privacy policy and cookie policy from under 60 euros a year
- From
- €59.88/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Intapp the product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.; iubenda plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- They diverge on capability: Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake, iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Intapp and iubenda actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Intapp
- Conflicts and business intake
- Confidentiality walls
- Time capture
- DealCloud
- Outside counsel guidelines compliance
Only in iubenda
- Privacy and cookie policy generator
- Google-certified CMP
- IAB TCF 2.2
- Consent solution for forms
- Register of processing activities
- Terms and conditions generator
- Accessibility widget
- Multi-language
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Intapp
- Large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvalsnot iubenda
- Practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policynot iubenda
- Firms losing revenue to outside counsel guideline breaches caught only after invoicingnot iubenda
- Advisory and capital markets teams needing deal pipeline and relationship managementnot iubenda
iubenda
- A small European publisher that needs Google-certified consent to keep serving Google demand but cannot pay enterprise CMP pricesnot Intapp
- An agency maintaining privacy policies across dozens of client sites that must stay current as services changenot Intapp
- A SaaS company selling into the EU that needs a defensible cookie banner and processing register without hiring a privacy lawyernot Intapp
- An e-commerce store adding third-party marketing tools that keeps having to update its cookie disclosurenot Intapp
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Intapp
- The product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.
- It assumes a firm large enough to have dedicated risk and compliance staff, and smaller practices have nobody to own the workflows it introduces.
- It sits alongside document management and billing rather than replacing them, adding integration work to an already complex estate.
- Pricing is not published, and the modular structure makes peer comparison harder because two firms rarely buy the same combination.
- Deployments change firm-wide processes such as matter opening, so rollout depends on partner behaviour change and commonly slips.
iubenda
- Plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- Generated policies are templates from a clause library, so unusual data processing, complex international transfers or sector-specific rules are not covered and still need a lawyer.
- It addresses the public-facing compliance surface only, with no data discovery, vendor risk assessment or data subject request automation, so a growing company will need a second platform.
- The accessibility product is delivered through a partner and priced separately, and overlay widgets of that kind are contested as an accessibility solution, so buying it does not remove legal exposure.
- Support is largely documentation and ticket based at the lower tiers, which is a poor match for an urgent regulatory query where the answer is needed the same day.
Pricing, plan by plan
Intapp
On request- Intapp$undefined/year
- Modular licensing quoted per firm
- Risk, intake, time and DealCloud modules priced separately
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
iubenda
€59.88/year- Essentials$59.88/year
- Up to 25,000 pageviews per month
- Privacy and cookie policy
- Google-certified CMP with Consent Mode
- Advanced$239.88/year
- Up to 50,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Essentials
- Additional consent and preference features
- Ultimate$959.88/year
- Up to 150,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Advanced
- Higher volume consent recording
- Accessibility Standard$600/year
- Accessibility widget for 150,000 pageviews per month
- Delivered with a partner
- Separate from the compliance plans
Which should you pick?
Choose Intapp if
- You need conflicts and business intake.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want confidentiality walls.
Choose iubenda if
- You need privacy and cookie policy generator.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want google-certified cmp.
Questions people ask
- Is Intapp or iubenda better?
- Neither clearly leads. Intapp starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Intapp or iubenda?
- Intapp starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year.
- Does Intapp or iubenda run on more platforms?
- Intapp runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. iubenda runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Intapp best used for?
- Intapp is most often used for large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvals, practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policy, firms losing revenue to outside counsel guideline breaches caught only after invoicing, advisory and capital markets teams needing deal pipeline and relationship management. Of those, large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvals and practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policy are not what iubenda is typically brought in for.
- What can Intapp do that iubenda cannot?
- Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake, Confidentiality walls, Time capture, DealCloud. iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator, Google-certified CMP, IAB TCF 2.2, Consent solution for forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Intapp: Is Intapp a practice management system?
No. It covers risk, compliance, intake and time capture. Firms run it alongside a billing and matter financial system such as Aderant or Elite 3E.
iubenda: Is iubenda a certified consent platform?
Yes. It is an IAB-validated CMP supporting TCF 2.2 and a Google-certified CMP partner with Consent Mode built in.
Intapp: Can we check Intapp's financial position before committing?
Yes, which is unusual in this market. Intapp has been listed on Nasdaq since 2021, so revenue and retention figures appear in public filings rather than only in sales material.
iubenda: What does it cost?
Prices are published: 59.88 euros a year for up to 25,000 monthly pageviews, 239.88 for 50,000 and 959.88 for 150,000.
Intapp: What size of firm is it for?
Large firms and advisory businesses with a formal risk function. Small practices handle conflicts inside their practice management system instead.
iubenda: Do the generated policies make me compliant?
They cover the disclosure obligations for common processing. Unusual processing, international transfers or sector rules still need legal advice.
iubenda: Does it handle data subject access requests?
Not in the way a dedicated privacy platform does. It is focused on policies, consent and processing records.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Intapp vs Clio
- Intapp vs Ironclad
- Intapp vs NetDocuments
- Intapp vs Lawmatics
- Intapp vs Aderant
- Intapp vs Smokeball
- Intapp vs Docketwise
- Intapp vs Luminance
- Intapp vs iManage
- Intapp vs Secure Privacy
- Intapp vs MyCase
- Intapp vs LexisNexis
- Intapp vs Actionstep
- Intapp vs DISCO
- Intapp vs Didomi
- Intapp vs Cookiebot
- Intapp vs Everlaw
- Intapp vs CosmoLex
- Intapp vs Harvey
- Intapp vs Filevine
- Intapp vs CASEpeer
- Intapp vs Westlaw
- iubenda vs Clio
- iubenda vs Ironclad
- iubenda vs NetDocuments
- iubenda vs Lawmatics
- iubenda vs Aderant
- iubenda vs Smokeball
- iubenda vs Docketwise
- iubenda vs Luminance
- iubenda vs iManage
- iubenda vs Secure Privacy
- iubenda vs MyCase
- iubenda vs LexisNexis
- iubenda vs Actionstep
- iubenda vs DISCO
- iubenda vs Didomi
- iubenda vs Cookiebot
- iubenda vs Everlaw
- iubenda vs CosmoLex
- iubenda vs Harvey
- iubenda vs Filevine
- iubenda vs CASEpeer
- iubenda vs Westlaw