Legal · head to head
Everlaw vs Intapp
Intapp
Legal
Risk, compliance and business intake software for professional services firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Everlaw quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance; Intapp the product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.
- They diverge on capability: Everlaw covers Document processing, Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Everlaw and Intapp actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Everlaw
- Document processing
- Predictive coding
- Review workflow
- Search and clustering
- Case building
- Cloud-native
Only in Intapp
- Conflicts and business intake
- Confidentiality walls
- Time capture
- DealCloud
- Outside counsel guidelines compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Everlaw
- Litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document setsnot Intapp
- Government and corporate investigations requiring defensible reviewnot Intapp
- Firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructurenot Intapp
Intapp
- Large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvalsnot Everlaw
- Practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policynot Everlaw
- Firms losing revenue to outside counsel guideline breaches caught only after invoicingnot Everlaw
- Advisory and capital markets teams needing deal pipeline and relationship managementnot Everlaw
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Everlaw
- Quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
- Specialist product: outside litigation and investigations there is no use for it
- Predictive coding requires a properly trained review workflow, and poor input produces unreliable prioritisation
- Data volume charges can escalate sharply on large matters
Intapp
- The product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.
- It assumes a firm large enough to have dedicated risk and compliance staff, and smaller practices have nobody to own the workflows it introduces.
- It sits alongside document management and billing rather than replacing them, adding integration work to an already complex estate.
- Pricing is not published, and the modular structure makes peer comparison harder because two firms rarely buy the same combination.
- Deployments change firm-wide processes such as matter opening, so rollout depends on partner behaviour change and commonly slips.
Pricing, plan by plan
Everlaw
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Everlaw review.
Intapp
On request- Intapp$undefined/year
- Modular licensing quoted per firm
- Risk, intake, time and DealCloud modules priced separately
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Everlaw if
- You need document processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want predictive coding.
Choose Intapp if
- You need conflicts and business intake.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want confidentiality walls.
Questions people ask
- Is Everlaw or Intapp better?
- Neither clearly leads. Everlaw starts at On request and Intapp at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Everlaw or Intapp?
- Everlaw starts at On request and Intapp at On request.
- Does Everlaw or Intapp run on more platforms?
- Everlaw runs on Web, Cloud. Intapp runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is Everlaw best used for?
- Everlaw is most often used for litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document sets, government and corporate investigations requiring defensible review, firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructure. Of those, litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document sets and government and corporate investigations requiring defensible review are not what Intapp is typically brought in for.
- What can Everlaw do that Intapp cannot?
- Everlaw covers Document processing, Predictive coding, Review workflow, Search and clustering. Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake, Confidentiality walls, Time capture, DealCloud.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Everlaw: What does Everlaw cost?
Everlaw does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally priced on data volume and users, which is why costs are quoted per matter or per organisation.
Intapp: Is Intapp a practice management system?
No. It covers risk, compliance, intake and time capture. Firms run it alongside a billing and matter financial system such as Aderant or Elite 3E.
Everlaw: What is ediscovery?
The process of identifying, collecting and reviewing electronic documents as evidence in litigation or investigation.
Intapp: Can we check Intapp's financial position before committing?
Yes, which is unusual in this market. Intapp has been listed on Nasdaq since 2021, so revenue and retention figures appear in public filings rather than only in sales material.
Everlaw: What is predictive coding?
Machine learning trained on reviewer decisions to prioritise documents likely to be relevant, so a team reviews the important fraction rather than everything.
Intapp: What size of firm is it for?
Large firms and advisory businesses with a formal risk function. Small practices handle conflicts inside their practice management system instead.
Everlaw: Is Everlaw only for law firms?
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Everlaw vs Relativity
- Everlaw vs Logikcull
- Everlaw vs DISCO
- Everlaw vs Luminance
- Everlaw vs NetDocuments
- Everlaw vs Filevine
- Everlaw vs Clio
- Everlaw vs iubenda
- Everlaw vs CASEpeer
- Everlaw vs Litera
- Everlaw vs Ironclad
- Everlaw vs Spellbook
- Everlaw vs Litify
- Everlaw vs Rocket Matter
- Everlaw vs Secure Privacy
- Everlaw vs Tabs3
- Everlaw vs Lawmatics
- Everlaw vs Aderant
- Everlaw vs Smokeball
- Everlaw vs Docketwise
- Everlaw vs iManage
- Everlaw vs MyCase
- Everlaw vs LexisNexis
- Everlaw vs Actionstep
- Intapp vs Relativity
- Intapp vs Logikcull
- Intapp vs DISCO
- Intapp vs Luminance
- Intapp vs NetDocuments
- Intapp vs Filevine
- Intapp vs Clio
- Intapp vs iubenda
- Intapp vs CASEpeer
- Intapp vs Litera
- Intapp vs Ironclad
- Intapp vs Spellbook
- Intapp vs Litify
- Intapp vs Rocket Matter
- Intapp vs Secure Privacy
- Intapp vs Tabs3
- Intapp vs Lawmatics
- Intapp vs Aderant
- Intapp vs Smokeball
- Intapp vs Docketwise
- Intapp vs iManage
- Intapp vs MyCase
- Intapp vs LexisNexis
- Intapp vs Actionstep