Softwr

Legal · head to head

Everlaw vs iubenda

Everlaw logo

Everlaw

Legal

Cloud ediscovery and litigation platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
iubenda logo

iubenda

Legal

Published-price privacy compliance: certified consent banner, privacy policy and cookie policy from under 60 euros a year

From
€59.88/year
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Everlaw quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance; iubenda plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
  • They diverge on capability: Everlaw covers Document processing, iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Everlaw and iubenda actually diverge.

Attributes where Everlaw and iubenda differ
AttributeEverlawiubenda
Starting priceOn request€59.88/year
Pricing modelquotePer year by monthly pageviews
PlatformsWeb, CloudWeb, iOS, Android, API

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Everlaw

  • Document processing
  • Predictive coding
  • Review workflow
  • Search and clustering
  • Case building
  • Cloud-native

Only in iubenda

  • Privacy and cookie policy generator
  • Google-certified CMP
  • IAB TCF 2.2
  • Consent solution for forms
  • Register of processing activities
  • Terms and conditions generator
  • Accessibility widget
  • Multi-language

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Everlaw

  • Litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document setsnot iubenda
  • Government and corporate investigations requiring defensible reviewnot iubenda
  • Firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructurenot iubenda

iubenda

  • A small European publisher that needs Google-certified consent to keep serving Google demand but cannot pay enterprise CMP pricesnot Everlaw
  • An agency maintaining privacy policies across dozens of client sites that must stay current as services changenot Everlaw
  • A SaaS company selling into the EU that needs a defensible cookie banner and processing register without hiring a privacy lawyernot Everlaw
  • An e-commerce store adding third-party marketing tools that keeps having to update its cookie disclosurenot Everlaw

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Everlaw

  • Quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
  • Specialist product: outside litigation and investigations there is no use for it
  • Predictive coding requires a properly trained review workflow, and poor input produces unreliable prioritisation
  • Data volume charges can escalate sharply on large matters

iubenda

  • Plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
  • Generated policies are templates from a clause library, so unusual data processing, complex international transfers or sector-specific rules are not covered and still need a lawyer.
  • It addresses the public-facing compliance surface only, with no data discovery, vendor risk assessment or data subject request automation, so a growing company will need a second platform.
  • The accessibility product is delivered through a partner and priced separately, and overlay widgets of that kind are contested as an accessibility solution, so buying it does not remove legal exposure.
  • Support is largely documentation and ticket based at the lower tiers, which is a poor match for an urgent regulatory query where the answer is needed the same day.

Pricing, plan by plan

Everlaw

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Everlaw review.

iubenda

€59.88/year
  • Essentials$59.88/year
    • Up to 25,000 pageviews per month
    • Privacy and cookie policy
    • Google-certified CMP with Consent Mode
  • Advanced$239.88/year
    • Up to 50,000 pageviews per month
    • Everything in Essentials
    • Additional consent and preference features
  • Ultimate$959.88/year
    • Up to 150,000 pageviews per month
    • Everything in Advanced
    • Higher volume consent recording
  • Accessibility Standard$600/year
    • Accessibility widget for 150,000 pageviews per month
    • Delivered with a partner
    • Separate from the compliance plans

Which should you pick?

Choose Everlaw if

  • You need document processing.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want predictive coding.
Everlaw review

Choose iubenda if

  • You need privacy and cookie policy generator.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
  • You also want google-certified cmp.
iubenda review

Questions people ask

Is Everlaw or iubenda better?
Neither clearly leads. Everlaw starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Everlaw or iubenda?
Everlaw starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year.
Does Everlaw or iubenda run on more platforms?
Everlaw runs on Web, Cloud. iubenda runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
What is Everlaw best used for?
Everlaw is most often used for litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document sets, government and corporate investigations requiring defensible review, firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructure. Of those, litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document sets and government and corporate investigations requiring defensible review are not what iubenda is typically brought in for.
What can Everlaw do that iubenda cannot?
Everlaw covers Document processing, Predictive coding, Review workflow, Search and clustering. iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator, Google-certified CMP, IAB TCF 2.2, Consent solution for forms.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Everlaw: What does Everlaw cost?

Everlaw does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally priced on data volume and users, which is why costs are quoted per matter or per organisation.

iubenda: Is iubenda a certified consent platform?

Yes. It is an IAB-validated CMP supporting TCF 2.2 and a Google-certified CMP partner with Consent Mode built in.

Everlaw: What is ediscovery?

The process of identifying, collecting and reviewing electronic documents as evidence in litigation or investigation.

iubenda: What does it cost?

Prices are published: 59.88 euros a year for up to 25,000 monthly pageviews, 239.88 for 50,000 and 959.88 for 150,000.

Everlaw: What is predictive coding?

Machine learning trained on reviewer decisions to prioritise documents likely to be relevant, so a team reviews the important fraction rather than everything.

iubenda: Do the generated policies make me compliant?

They cover the disclosure obligations for common processing. Unusual processing, international transfers or sector rules still need legal advice.

Everlaw: Is Everlaw only for law firms?

No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.

iubenda: Does it handle data subject access requests?

Not in the way a dedicated privacy platform does. It is focused on policies, consent and processing records.

Share

Related pages

More on Everlaw

More on iubenda

Keep looking

Other head to heads