Legal · head to head
DISCO vs iubenda
DISCO
Legal
Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
iubenda
Legal
Published-price privacy compliance: certified consent banner, privacy policy and cookie policy from under 60 euros a year
- From
- €59.88/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.; iubenda plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- They diverge on capability: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DISCO and iubenda actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DISCO
- All-in per-gigabyte pricing
- Cecilia AI
- Technology assisted review
- Legal hold
- Case Builder
- Self-service ingestion
Only in iubenda
- Privacy and cookie policy generator
- Google-certified CMP
- IAB TCF 2.2
- Consent solution for forms
- Register of processing activities
- Terms and conditions generator
- Accessibility widget
- Multi-language
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DISCO
- A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot iubenda
- A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot iubenda
- An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot iubenda
- A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot iubenda
iubenda
- A small European publisher that needs Google-certified consent to keep serving Google demand but cannot pay enterprise CMP pricesnot DISCO
- An agency maintaining privacy policies across dozens of client sites that must stay current as services changenot DISCO
- A SaaS company selling into the EU that needs a defensible cookie banner and processing register without hiring a privacy lawyernot DISCO
- An e-commerce store adding third-party marketing tools that keeps having to update its cookie disclosurenot DISCO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DISCO
- Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
- Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
- Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
- As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
- Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.
iubenda
- Plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- Generated policies are templates from a clause library, so unusual data processing, complex international transfers or sector-specific rules are not covered and still need a lawyer.
- It addresses the public-facing compliance surface only, with no data discovery, vendor risk assessment or data subject request automation, so a growing company will need a second platform.
- The accessibility product is delivered through a partner and priced separately, and overlay widgets of that kind are contested as an accessibility solution, so buying it does not remove legal exposure.
- Support is largely documentation and ticket based at the lower tiers, which is a poor match for an urgent regulatory query where the answer is needed the same day.
Pricing, plan by plan
DISCO
On request- DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
- Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
- Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
- Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules
iubenda
€59.88/year- Essentials$59.88/year
- Up to 25,000 pageviews per month
- Privacy and cookie policy
- Google-certified CMP with Consent Mode
- Advanced$239.88/year
- Up to 50,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Essentials
- Additional consent and preference features
- Ultimate$959.88/year
- Up to 150,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Advanced
- Higher volume consent recording
- Accessibility Standard$600/year
- Accessibility widget for 150,000 pageviews per month
- Delivered with a partner
- Separate from the compliance plans
Which should you pick?
Choose iubenda if
- You need privacy and cookie policy generator.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want google-certified cmp.
Questions people ask
- Is DISCO or iubenda better?
- Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DISCO or iubenda?
- DISCO starts at On request and iubenda at €59.88/year.
- Does DISCO or iubenda run on more platforms?
- DISCO runs on Web. iubenda runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is DISCO best used for?
- DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what iubenda is typically brought in for.
- What can DISCO do that iubenda cannot?
- DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator, Google-certified CMP, IAB TCF 2.2, Consent solution for forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DISCO: How is DISCO priced?
Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.
iubenda: Is iubenda a certified consent platform?
Yes. It is an IAB-validated CMP supporting TCF 2.2 and a Google-certified CMP partner with Consent Mode built in.
DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?
Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.
iubenda: What does it cost?
Prices are published: 59.88 euros a year for up to 25,000 monthly pageviews, 239.88 for 50,000 and 959.88 for 150,000.
DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?
On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.
iubenda: Do the generated policies make me compliant?
They cover the disclosure obligations for common processing. Unusual processing, international transfers or sector rules still need legal advice.
iubenda: Does it handle data subject access requests?
Not in the way a dedicated privacy platform does. It is focused on policies, consent and processing records.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DISCO vs Relativity
- DISCO vs Everlaw
- DISCO vs Logikcull
- DISCO vs Filevine
- DISCO vs Luminance
- DISCO vs CASEpeer
- DISCO vs Cookiebot
- DISCO vs LexisNexis
- DISCO vs Litify
- DISCO vs Ironclad
- DISCO vs Spellbook
- DISCO vs Intapp
- DISCO vs Litera
- DISCO vs Rocket Matter
- DISCO vs Secure Privacy
- DISCO vs Tabs3
- DISCO vs Didomi
- DISCO vs Clio
- DISCO vs NetDocuments
- DISCO vs CosmoLex
- DISCO vs Harvey
- DISCO vs Lawmatics
- DISCO vs Westlaw
- DISCO vs Docketwise
- iubenda vs Relativity
- iubenda vs Everlaw
- iubenda vs Logikcull
- iubenda vs Filevine
- iubenda vs Luminance
- iubenda vs CASEpeer
- iubenda vs Cookiebot
- iubenda vs LexisNexis
- iubenda vs Litify
- iubenda vs Ironclad
- iubenda vs Spellbook
- iubenda vs Intapp
- iubenda vs Litera
- iubenda vs Rocket Matter
- iubenda vs Secure Privacy
- iubenda vs Tabs3
- iubenda vs Didomi
- iubenda vs Clio
- iubenda vs NetDocuments
- iubenda vs CosmoLex
- iubenda vs Harvey
- iubenda vs Lawmatics
- iubenda vs Westlaw
- iubenda vs Docketwise