APIs · head to head
Increase vs Kong

Increase
APIs
Direct banking API for ACH, wires, real-time payments, accounts and cards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Increase the published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Increase and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Increase
- ACH origination and receipt
- Domestic wires
- Real-time payments
- Bank accounts
- Cards
- Cheques
- Sandbox and simulations
- Audit and reconciliation data
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Increase
- A payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ACH and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processornot Kong
- A marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbersnot Kong
- A fintech that wants FedNow and RTP payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hoursnot Kong
- An engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logicnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Increase
- API development and testingnot Increase
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Increase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Increase
- The published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- Free allowances are deliberately small at ten account numbers and five physical cards, so any programme issuing accounts or cards at volume moves to quoted pricing almost immediately.
- Banking is provided through partner banks, so programme approval, compliance obligations and the ability to launch at all depend on a bank relationship you do not control, and post-Synapse bank risk appetite has tightened considerably.
- The API deliberately exposes payment rail mechanics rather than smoothing them, which is correct engineering but means a team without payments expertise will build reconciliation and return handling wrongly and only discover it when funds go astray.
- Coverage is United States only, so a company with international payout needs runs a second provider and reconciles two ledgers, and the single API argument disappears at the first cross border customer.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Increase
On request- Increase Platform$undefined/month
- Monthly fee quoted by use case and not published
- Next-day ACH origination listed at 0.50 US dollars per transaction
- Same-day ACH origination listed at 2.00 per transaction
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Increase if
- You need ach origination and receipt.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want domestic wires.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Increase or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Increase starts at On request and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Increase or Kong?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Increase and Free for Kong.
- Does Increase or Kong run on more platforms?
- Increase runs on API, Web. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Increase starts at On request.
- What is Increase best used for?
- Increase is most often used for a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor, a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers, a fintech that wants fednow and rtp payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hours, an engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logic. Of those, a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor and a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Increase do that Kong cannot?
- Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Domestic wires, Real-time payments, Bank accounts. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Increase: Does Increase publish its pricing?
Partly. Per transaction fees for ACH, wires, RTP, FedNow and cards are listed publicly. The monthly platform fee is not, and it is described only as varying by use case.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceIncrease: Who holds the deposits?
Partner banks, not Increase itself. That relationship determines your programme approval, your compliance obligations and your risk if the bank changes appetite.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceIncrease: Is it international?
No. Increase covers United States rails only, so cross border payouts require a second provider.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceIncrease: How is it different from a middleware BaaS platform?
It exposes the rails rather than abstracting them, showing real return codes and settlement timing. That suits teams who understand payments and punishes teams who do not.
Kong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Increase vs Dwolla
- Increase vs Astra
- Increase vs Unit
- Increase vs Treasury Prime
- Increase vs Sila
- Increase vs Moov
- Increase vs Column
- Increase vs Lithic
- Increase vs Volt
- Increase vs Swan
- Increase vs TrueLayer
- Increase vs Griffin
- Increase vs KeystoneJS
- Increase vs Liveblocks
- Increase vs Moesif
- Increase vs Ozone API
- Increase vs Parse Server
- Increase vs Convoy
- Increase vs PocketBase
- Increase vs Appwrite
- Increase vs Hasura
- Increase vs Sanity
- Increase vs Tyk
- Increase vs WSO2 API Manager
- Increase vs Gravitee
- Increase vs Janus Gateway
- Increase vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Increase vs 3scale
- Increase vs Akana
- Increase vs Enable Banking
- Increase vs Flybits
- Increase vs i2c
- Kong vs Dwolla
- Kong vs Astra
- Kong vs Unit
- Kong vs Treasury Prime
- Kong vs Sila
- Kong vs Moov
- Kong vs Column
- Kong vs Lithic
- Kong vs Volt
- Kong vs Swan
- Kong vs TrueLayer
- Kong vs Griffin
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Ozone API
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c

