APIs · head to head
Increase vs Sanity

Increase
APIs
Direct banking API for ACH, wires, real-time payments, accounts and cards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sanity
APIs
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sanity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Increase the published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Sanity covers Content API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Increase and Sanity actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Increase
- ACH origination and receipt
- Domestic wires
- Real-time payments
- Bank accounts
- Cards
- Cheques
- Sandbox and simulations
- Audit and reconciliation data
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Increase
- A payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ACH and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processornot Sanity
- A marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbersnot Sanity
- A fintech that wants FedNow and RTP payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hoursnot Sanity
- An engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logicnot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot Increase
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot Increase
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot Increase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Increase
- The published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- Free allowances are deliberately small at ten account numbers and five physical cards, so any programme issuing accounts or cards at volume moves to quoted pricing almost immediately.
- Banking is provided through partner banks, so programme approval, compliance obligations and the ability to launch at all depend on a bank relationship you do not control, and post-Synapse bank risk appetite has tightened considerably.
- The API deliberately exposes payment rail mechanics rather than smoothing them, which is correct engineering but means a team without payments expertise will build reconciliation and return handling wrongly and only discover it when funds go astray.
- Coverage is United States only, so a company with international payout needs runs a second provider and reconciles two ledgers, and the single API argument disappears at the first cross border customer.
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
Increase
On request- Increase Platform$undefined/month
- Monthly fee quoted by use case and not published
- Next-day ACH origination listed at 0.50 US dollars per transaction
- Same-day ACH origination listed at 2.00 per transaction
Sanity
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 20 seats
- 2 public datasets only
- 10,000 documents included
- Growth$15/month
- Up to 50 seats per seat
- 2 private or public datasets
- 25,000 documents included
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom seats
- Custom datasets
- Custom document limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Increase if
- You need ach origination and receipt.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want domestic wires.
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is Increase or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Increase starts at On request and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Increase or Sanity?
- Sanity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Increase and Free for Sanity.
- Does Increase or Sanity run on more platforms?
- Increase runs on API, Web. Sanity runs on Web.
- Can I use Sanity for free?
- Yes. Sanity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Increase starts at On request.
- What is Increase best used for?
- Increase is most often used for a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor, a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers, a fintech that wants fednow and rtp payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hours, an engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logic. Of those, a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor and a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can Increase do that Sanity cannot?
- Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Domestic wires, Real-time payments, Bank accounts. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Increase: Does Increase publish its pricing?
Partly. Per transaction fees for ACH, wires, RTP, FedNow and cards are listed publicly. The monthly platform fee is not, and it is described only as varying by use case.
Sanity: What does the Sanity Free plan include?
The Free plan includes up to 20 seats, 2 public datasets, 10,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests per month, and 2 permission roles.
SourceIncrease: Who holds the deposits?
Partner banks, not Increase itself. That relationship determines your programme approval, your compliance obligations and your risk if the bank changes appetite.
Sanity: How much does Sanity Growth plan cost per user?
The Growth plan costs $15 per seat per month, with up to 50 seats, and includes 25,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests, and 5 permission roles.
SourceIncrease: Is it international?
No. Increase covers United States rails only, so cross border payouts require a second provider.
Sanity: What is included in Sanity Enterprise pricing?
Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales. It includes custom seat limits, custom datasets, Single Sign-On, and dedicated support.
SourceIncrease: How is it different from a middleware BaaS platform?
It exposes the rails rather than abstracting them, showing real return codes and settlement timing. That suits teams who understand payments and punishes teams who do not.
Sanity: Does Sanity offer annual billing discounts?
Annual and invoice payment options are available exclusively for Enterprise customers. Self-serve plans (Free and Growth) use monthly billing only.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Increase vs Dwolla
- Increase vs Astra
- Increase vs Unit
- Increase vs Treasury Prime
- Increase vs Sila
- Increase vs Moov
- Increase vs Column
- Increase vs Lithic
- Increase vs Volt
- Increase vs Swan
- Increase vs TrueLayer
- Increase vs Griffin
- Increase vs KeystoneJS
- Increase vs Kong
- Increase vs Liveblocks
- Increase vs Moesif
- Increase vs Ozone API
- Increase vs Parse Server
- Increase vs Payload CMS
- Increase vs Strapi
- Increase vs GraphQL Apollo
- Increase vs Prisma
- Increase vs Sensedia
- Increase vs Hasura
- Increase vs PocketBase
- Increase vs Directus
- Increase vs Paw
- Increase vs Tyk
- Increase vs Janus Gateway
- Increase vs Kong Gateway
- Increase vs Marqeta
- Increase vs Meniga
- Increase vs MX Technologies
- Increase vs PubNub
- Sanity vs Dwolla
- Sanity vs Astra
- Sanity vs Unit
- Sanity vs Treasury Prime
- Sanity vs Sila
- Sanity vs Moov
- Sanity vs Column
- Sanity vs Lithic
- Sanity vs Volt
- Sanity vs Swan
- Sanity vs TrueLayer
- Sanity vs Griffin
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Kong
- Sanity vs Liveblocks
- Sanity vs Moesif
- Sanity vs Ozone API
- Sanity vs Parse Server
- Sanity vs Payload CMS
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs GraphQL Apollo
- Sanity vs Prisma
- Sanity vs Sensedia
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Directus
- Sanity vs Paw
- Sanity vs Tyk
- Sanity vs Janus Gateway
- Sanity vs Kong Gateway
- Sanity vs Marqeta
- Sanity vs Meniga
- Sanity vs MX Technologies
- Sanity vs PubNub
