APIs · head to head
Appwrite vs Increase

Increase
APIs
Direct banking API for ACH, wires, real-time payments, accounts and cards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Appwrite has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Appwrite smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions; Increase the published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- They diverge on capability: Appwrite covers REST API, Increase covers ACH origination and receipt.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appwrite and Increase actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appwrite
- REST API
- Authentication
- Database
- Multiple SDKs
- Cloud functions
- File storage
- Docker support
- Self-hosted support
Only in Increase
- ACH origination and receipt
- Domestic wires
- Real-time payments
- Bank accounts
- Cards
- Cheques
- Sandbox and simulations
- Audit and reconciliation data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appwrite
- API Developmentnot Increase
- API Gatewaynot Increase
- API Testingnot Increase
- API Documentationnot Increase
- Microservicesnot Increase
Increase
- A payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ACH and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processornot Appwrite
- A marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbersnot Appwrite
- A fintech that wants FedNow and RTP payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hoursnot Appwrite
- An engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logicnot Appwrite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appwrite
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions
- Analytics, crash reporting, and A/B testing not included (Firebase includes these)
- Requires infrastructure management for self-hosted deployments; not fully managed like Firebase Cloud
- Mobile app support not as mature as Firebase's native iOS/Android SDKs
Increase
- The published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- Free allowances are deliberately small at ten account numbers and five physical cards, so any programme issuing accounts or cards at volume moves to quoted pricing almost immediately.
- Banking is provided through partner banks, so programme approval, compliance obligations and the ability to launch at all depend on a bank relationship you do not control, and post-Synapse bank risk appetite has tightened considerably.
- The API deliberately exposes payment rail mechanics rather than smoothing them, which is correct engineering but means a team without payments expertise will build reconciliation and return handling wrongly and only discover it when funds go astray.
- Coverage is United States only, so a company with international payout needs runs a second provider and reconciles two ledgers, and the single API argument disappears at the first cross border customer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Appwrite
Free- Cloud FreeFree
- 75K MAU
- 10GB storage
- Unlimited projects
- Cloud Pro$15/month
- More storage
- Priority support
Increase
On request- Increase Platform$undefined/month
- Monthly fee quoted by use case and not published
- Next-day ACH origination listed at 0.50 US dollars per transaction
- Same-day ACH origination listed at 2.00 per transaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Appwrite if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker.
- You also want authentication.
Choose Increase if
- You need ach origination and receipt.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want domestic wires.
Questions people ask
- Is Appwrite or Increase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appwrite starts at Free and Increase at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appwrite or Increase?
- Appwrite has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Appwrite and On request for Increase.
- Does Appwrite or Increase run on more platforms?
- Appwrite runs on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker. Increase runs on API, Web.
- Can I use Appwrite for free?
- Yes. Appwrite has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Increase starts at On request.
- What is Appwrite best used for?
- Appwrite is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Increase is typically brought in for.
- What can Appwrite do that Increase cannot?
- Appwrite covers REST API, Authentication, Database, Multiple SDKs. Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Domestic wires, Real-time payments, Bank accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appwrite: Can Appwrite be self-hosted?
Yes. Appwrite is fully open-source and self-hosted with a single Docker command. Self-hosting is completely free with no feature restrictions, unlike the managed Appwrite Cloud.
SourceIncrease: Does Increase publish its pricing?
Partly. Per transaction fees for ACH, wires, RTP, FedNow and cards are listed publicly. The monthly platform fee is not, and it is described only as varying by use case.
Appwrite: What is Appwrite Cloud's pricing?
Appwrite Cloud offers a free tier with unlimited projects, 75K monthly active users, and 10GB storage with no time limit. Pro plan starts at $15/month per organization member. Scale plan at $599/month includes dedicated resources and SOC 2 compliance.
SourceIncrease: Who holds the deposits?
Partner banks, not Increase itself. That relationship determines your programme approval, your compliance obligations and your risk if the bank changes appetite.
Appwrite: What programming languages does Appwrite support?
Appwrite provides SDKs for 15+ languages including JavaScript, Flutter, Swift, Kotlin, Python, Ruby, PHP, .NET, and more, offering more language flexibility than Firebase.
SourceIncrease: Is it international?
No. Increase covers United States rails only, so cross border payouts require a second provider.
Appwrite: What backend services does Appwrite provide?
Appwrite includes Auth (with multi-factor auth), Databases, Storage (with compression and encryption), Serverless Functions, Messaging, Realtime subscriptions, and Sites (for hosting static and full-stack apps).
SourceIncrease: How is it different from a middleware BaaS platform?
It exposes the rails rather than abstracting them, showing real return codes and settlement timing. That suits teams who understand payments and punishes teams who do not.
Appwrite: Does Appwrite include real-time capabilities?
Yes. Appwrite's Realtime service covers all platform services by default through WebSocket subscriptions, enabling real-time updates across databases, functions, and messages.
SourceAppwrite: How does Appwrite compare to Firebase on costs?
Appwrite offers better cost predictability. Firebase's pay-per-read/write model can lead to unexpected bills with runaway queries, while Appwrite's self-hosted model only requires paying for your own infrastructure with completely predictable costs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Appwrite vs Parse Server
- Appwrite vs PocketBase
- Appwrite vs Hasura
- Appwrite vs Directus
- Appwrite vs Tyk
- Appwrite vs Backendless
- Appwrite vs Strapi
- Appwrite vs Gravitee
- Appwrite vs Hoppscotch
- Appwrite vs Bruno
- Appwrite vs KeystoneJS
- Appwrite vs Kong
- Appwrite vs Salt Edge
- Appwrite vs Skyflow
- Appwrite vs Yodlee
- Appwrite vs Backbase
- Appwrite vs Enfuce
- Appwrite vs Griffin
- Appwrite vs Dwolla
- Appwrite vs Astra
- Appwrite vs Unit
- Appwrite vs Treasury Prime
- Appwrite vs Sila
- Appwrite vs Moov
- Appwrite vs Column
- Appwrite vs Lithic
- Appwrite vs Volt
- Appwrite vs Swan
- Appwrite vs TrueLayer
- Appwrite vs Liveblocks
- Appwrite vs Moesif
- Appwrite vs Ozone API
- Increase vs Parse Server
- Increase vs PocketBase
- Increase vs Hasura
- Increase vs Directus
- Increase vs Tyk
- Increase vs Backendless
- Increase vs Strapi
- Increase vs Gravitee
- Increase vs Hoppscotch
- Increase vs Bruno
- Increase vs KeystoneJS
- Increase vs Kong
- Increase vs Salt Edge
- Increase vs Skyflow
- Increase vs Yodlee
- Increase vs Backbase
- Increase vs Enfuce
- Increase vs Griffin
- Increase vs Dwolla
- Increase vs Astra
- Increase vs Unit
- Increase vs Treasury Prime
- Increase vs Sila
- Increase vs Moov
- Increase vs Column
- Increase vs Lithic
- Increase vs Volt
- Increase vs Swan
- Increase vs TrueLayer
- Increase vs Liveblocks
- Increase vs Moesif
- Increase vs Ozone API

