Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Sumsub

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Sumsub actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Sumsub |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.35/verification |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per verification |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Sumsub
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Sumsub
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Sumsub
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot IBM QRadar
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot IBM QRadar
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot IBM QRadar
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Sumsub?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does IBM QRadar or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Sumsub cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Shufti Pro
- IBM QRadar vs Jumio
- IBM QRadar vs Socure
- IBM QRadar vs Signicat
- IBM QRadar vs iDenfy
- IBM QRadar vs Trulioo
- IBM QRadar vs Veriff
- IBM QRadar vs IDnow
- IBM QRadar vs Quantexa
- IBM QRadar vs Fenergo
- IBM QRadar vs NICE Actimize
- IBM QRadar vs Yoti
- IBM QRadar vs Mimecast
- IBM QRadar vs Motorola Vigilant
- IBM QRadar vs Nessus
- IBM QRadar vs NordPass
- IBM QRadar vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sumsub vs 1Password
- Sumsub vs Norton 360
- Sumsub vs LastPass
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Sumsub vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Sumsub vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Sumsub vs Recorded Future
- Sumsub vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Sumsub vs Proofpoint
- Sumsub vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sumsub vs Arnica
- Sumsub vs Authelia
- Sumsub vs Authy
- Sumsub vs Baffle
- Sumsub vs Beyond Identity
- Sumsub vs BeyondTrust
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
