Cybersecurity · head to head
HID Global vs Signicat

HID Global
Cybersecurity
Physical access control, credential issuance and workforce authentication hardware and software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HID Global sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: HID Global covers Physical access readers, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HID Global and Signicat actually diverge.
| Attribute | HID Global | Signicat |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HID Global
- Physical access readers
- Mobile access
- Seos credential technology
- Card issuance
- Workforce authentication
- Visitor management
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HID Global
- An enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estatenot Signicat
- A government agency needing card issuance and PKI credentials under a national identity programmenot Signicat
- A hospital consolidating access control, visitor screening and clinician authentication onto one credentialnot Signicat
- An organisation retiring cloneable legacy proximity cards after a physical penetration test found them trivially copiednot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot HID Global
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot HID Global
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot HID Global
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot HID Global
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HID Global
- Sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.
- Mobile credentials are charged per identity as an ongoing fee, which converts a one-off card cost into a recurring per-employee subscription that budgets rarely anticipate.
- Large estates run mixed generations of readers, so a credential upgrade is a multi-year hardware programme and the software licence is a small fraction of the true cost.
- Legacy credential technologies still widely deployed have documented cloning weaknesses, and HID commercial interest in selling the replacement does not remove your exposure in the interim.
- The portfolio spans hardware, firmware and several acquired software products, so integration between HID own components is less consistent than the single-vendor pitch implies.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
HID Global
On request- HID Access and Identity Products$undefined/year
- Hardware, credentials and software quoted through channel partners
- Credential costs charged per card or per mobile identity
- Reader hardware and installation quoted separately
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose HID Global if
- You need physical access readers.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want mobile access.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is HID Global or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. HID Global starts at On request and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HID Global or Signicat?
- HID Global starts at On request and Signicat at On request.
- Does HID Global or Signicat run on more platforms?
- HID Global runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is HID Global best used for?
- HID Global is most often used for an enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estate, a government agency needing card issuance and pki credentials under a national identity programme, a hospital consolidating access control, visitor screening and clinician authentication onto one credential, an organisation retiring cloneable legacy proximity cards after a physical penetration test found them trivially copied. Of those, an enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estate and a government agency needing card issuance and pki credentials under a national identity programme are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can HID Global do that Signicat cannot?
- HID Global covers Physical access readers, Mobile access, Seos credential technology, Card issuance. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HID Global: Do we have to replace readers to use mobile credentials?
Often yes, at least in part. Reader capability determines which credential technologies work, and that hardware cost dominates the business case.
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
HID Global: Are mobile credentials cheaper than cards?
Not necessarily. Cards are a one-off cost per employee, mobile identities are typically a recurring charge, so the crossover depends on staff turnover.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
HID Global: Can we buy directly from HID?
Generally not for access control deployments. Products are sold and installed through channel partners, so partner selection is part of the buying decision.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HID Global vs Cisco Duo
- HID Global vs Doppler
- HID Global vs Authelia
- HID Global vs 1Password
- HID Global vs Clerk
- HID Global vs Frontegg
- HID Global vs authentik
- HID Global vs Logto
- HID Global vs Ory
- HID Global vs Beyond Identity
- HID Global vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- HID Global vs Saviynt
- HID Global vs Securiti
- HID Global vs Sigstore
- HID Global vs Speakeasy
- HID Global vs Sysdig
- HID Global vs Tenable
- HID Global vs Ory Kratos
- HID Global vs Jumio
- HID Global vs Sumsub
- HID Global vs IDnow
- HID Global vs Trulioo
- HID Global vs Veriff
- HID Global vs iDenfy
- HID Global vs Yoti
- HID Global vs Shufti Pro
- HID Global vs Socure
- HID Global vs March Networks
- HID Global vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- HID Global vs Semperis
- HID Global vs MetricStream
- HID Global vs Microsoft Defender
- HID Global vs Mimecast
- HID Global vs Motorola Vigilant
- HID Global vs Nessus
- HID Global vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Cisco Duo
- Signicat vs Doppler
- Signicat vs Authelia
- Signicat vs 1Password
- Signicat vs Clerk
- Signicat vs Frontegg
- Signicat vs authentik
- Signicat vs Logto
- Signicat vs Ory
- Signicat vs Beyond Identity
- Signicat vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Signicat vs Saviynt
- Signicat vs Securiti
- Signicat vs Sigstore
- Signicat vs Speakeasy
- Signicat vs Sysdig
- Signicat vs Tenable
- Signicat vs Ory Kratos
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
