Cybersecurity · head to head
Signicat vs Tenable

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Signicat and Tenable actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Tenable
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Tenable
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Tenable
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Signicat
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Signicat
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Signicat
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Signicat
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Signicat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Signicat or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Signicat starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Signicat or Tenable?
- Signicat starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year.
- Does Signicat or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- What is Signicat best used for?
- Signicat is most often used for a lender expanding from norway into sweden, denmark and the netherlands without four separate eid integrations, an insurer needing eidas qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a european court, a bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank id rather than photographing a passport, a public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eid schemes under eidas. Of those, a lender expanding from norway into sweden, denmark and the netherlands without four separate eid integrations and an insurer needing eidas qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a european court are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Signicat do that Tenable cannot?
- Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceSignicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceSignicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Netwrix
- Signicat vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Signicat vs Qualys VMDR
- Signicat vs Aikido
- Signicat vs Arnica
- Signicat vs Doppler
- Signicat vs Chainguard
- Signicat vs Recorded Future
- Signicat vs Speakeasy
- Signicat vs Sysdig
- Signicat vs Endor Labs
- Signicat vs Tanium
- Signicat vs Enpass
- Signicat vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Signicat vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Signicat vs HID Global
- Signicat vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Jumio
- Tenable vs Sumsub
- Tenable vs IDnow
- Tenable vs Trulioo
- Tenable vs Veriff
- Tenable vs iDenfy
- Tenable vs Yoti
- Tenable vs Shufti Pro
- Tenable vs Socure
- Tenable vs March Networks
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Semperis
- Tenable vs MetricStream
- Tenable vs Microsoft Defender
- Tenable vs Mimecast
- Tenable vs Motorola Vigilant
- Tenable vs Nessus
- Tenable vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
