Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs HID Global

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

HID Global
Cybersecurity
Physical access control, credential issuance and workforce authentication hardware and software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; HID Global sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.
- They diverge on capability: Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, HID Global covers Physical access readers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and HID Global actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | HID Global |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in HID Global
- Physical access readers
- Mobile access
- Seos credential technology
- Card issuance
- Workforce authentication
- Visitor management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot HID Global
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot HID Global
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot HID Global
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot HID Global
HID Global
- An enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estatenot Beyond Identity
- A government agency needing card issuance and PKI credentials under a national identity programmenot Beyond Identity
- A hospital consolidating access control, visitor screening and clinician authentication onto one credentialnot Beyond Identity
- An organisation retiring cloneable legacy proximity cards after a physical penetration test found them trivially copiednot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
HID Global
- Sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.
- Mobile credentials are charged per identity as an ongoing fee, which converts a one-off card cost into a recurring per-employee subscription that budgets rarely anticipate.
- Large estates run mixed generations of readers, so a credential upgrade is a multi-year hardware programme and the software licence is a small fraction of the true cost.
- Legacy credential technologies still widely deployed have documented cloning weaknesses, and HID commercial interest in selling the replacement does not remove your exposure in the interim.
- The portfolio spans hardware, firmware and several acquired software products, so integration between HID own components is less consistent than the single-vendor pitch implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
HID Global
On request- HID Access and Identity Products$undefined/year
- Hardware, credentials and software quoted through channel partners
- Credential costs charged per card or per mobile identity
- Reader hardware and installation quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Choose HID Global if
- You need physical access readers.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want mobile access.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or HID Global better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and HID Global at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or HID Global?
- Beyond Identity starts at On request and HID Global at On request.
- Does Beyond Identity or HID Global run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. HID Global runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what HID Global is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that HID Global cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration. HID Global covers Physical access readers, Mobile access, Seos credential technology, Card issuance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
HID Global: Do we have to replace readers to use mobile credentials?
Often yes, at least in part. Reader capability determines which credential technologies work, and that hardware cost dominates the business case.
Beyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
HID Global: Are mobile credentials cheaper than cards?
Not necessarily. Cards are a one-off cost per employee, mobile identities are typically a recurring charge, so the crossover depends on staff turnover.
Beyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
HID Global: Can we buy directly from HID?
Generally not for access control deployments. Products are sold and installed through channel partners, so partner selection is part of the buying decision.
Related pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Doppler
- Beyond Identity vs Saviynt
- Beyond Identity vs Securiti
- Beyond Identity vs Sigstore
- Beyond Identity vs Speakeasy
- Beyond Identity vs Sysdig
- Beyond Identity vs Tenable
- Beyond Identity vs Ory Kratos
- HID Global vs 1Password
- HID Global vs Cisco Duo
- HID Global vs Transmit Security
- HID Global vs Teleport
- HID Global vs Authelia
- HID Global vs authentik
- HID Global vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- HID Global vs Clerk
- HID Global vs Frontegg
- HID Global vs HashiCorp Boundary
- HID Global vs Logto
- HID Global vs Ory
- HID Global vs WorkOS
- HID Global vs Zscaler Internet Access
- HID Global vs Milestone XProtect
- HID Global vs Osano
- HID Global vs Proton Mail
- HID Global vs Veriff
- HID Global vs Doppler
- HID Global vs Saviynt
- HID Global vs Securiti
- HID Global vs Sigstore
- HID Global vs Speakeasy
- HID Global vs Sysdig
- HID Global vs Tenable
- HID Global vs Ory Kratos
