APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Pusher

Pusher
APIs
Realtime messaging API for building live features into apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Pusher the free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Pusher covers Pub/sub channels.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Pusher actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | web, ios, android, api |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Pusher
- Pub/sub channels
- Presence channels
- Client libraries
- Webhooks
- 24/7 monitoring
- Priority support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Pusher
- Schema federationnot Pusher
- API analytics and monitoringnot Pusher
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Pusher
Pusher
- Adding live chat to a web or mobile appnot GraphQL Apollo
- Showing realtime presence of online usersnot GraphQL Apollo
- Pushing live notifications or dashboard updatesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Building collaborative features without managing WebSocket serversnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pusher
- The free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- Pricing jumps sharply between tiers (e.g. $49 to $99 to $299), leaving few options for teams with moderate but growing usage.
- Priority support with faster response times costs an additional $3,000/month on top of plan pricing.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Pusher
Free- SandboxFree
- 200k messages/day
- 100 concurrent connections
- Standard support
- Startup$49/month
- 1M messages/day
- 500 concurrent connections
- Pro$99/month
- 4M messages/day
- 2,000 concurrent connections
- Business$299/month
- 10M messages/day
- 5,000 concurrent connections
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Pusher if
- You need pub/sub channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence channels.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Pusher better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Pusher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Pusher?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Pusher at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Pusher run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Pusher is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Pusher cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourcePusher: What does Pusher cost?
Pusher Channels offers a free Sandbox plan (200k messages/day, 100 connections) and paid plans starting at $49/month for Startup, scaling up through Pro, Business, and several higher tiers up to $1,199/month, plus custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourcePusher: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, customers can log into the dashboard and adjust their plan at any time, including upgrading, downgrading, or cancelling.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourcePusher: How is usage metered?
Usage is measured by concurrent connections and messages per day; a message counts both the publish and each delivery, so publishing one message to 50 subscribers counts as 51 messages.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Ably
- GraphQL Apollo vs PubNub
- GraphQL Apollo vs Liveblocks
- GraphQL Apollo vs Svix
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apollo GraphQL
- GraphQL Apollo vs Zeplo
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backbase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Temenos Transact
- GraphQL Apollo vs Episode Six
- GraphQL Apollo vs Skaleet
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- GraphQL Apollo vs i2c
- GraphQL Apollo vs Boomi API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Codat
- GraphQL Apollo vs curl
- GraphQL Apollo vs Fintech Farm
- GraphQL Apollo vs Fintecture
- GraphQL Apollo vs Formance
- Pusher vs Hasura
- Pusher vs Appwrite
- Pusher vs PocketBase
- Pusher vs Sanity
- Pusher vs Strapi
- Pusher vs GraphQL Playground
- Pusher vs Kong Gateway
- Pusher vs Parse Server
- Pusher vs WSO2 API Manager
- Pusher vs Janus Gateway
- Pusher vs Directus
- Pusher vs KeystoneJS
- Pusher vs Solaris
- Pusher vs Stainless
- Pusher vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Pusher vs Thredd
- Pusher vs Thunder Client
- Pusher vs Ably
- Pusher vs PubNub
- Pusher vs Liveblocks
- Pusher vs Svix
- Pusher vs Apollo GraphQL
- Pusher vs Zeplo
- Pusher vs Backbase
- Pusher vs Temenos Transact
- Pusher vs Episode Six
- Pusher vs Skaleet
- Pusher vs Backendless
- Pusher vs i2c
- Pusher vs Boomi API Management
- Pusher vs Codat
- Pusher vs curl
- Pusher vs Fintech Farm
- Pusher vs Fintecture
- Pusher vs Formance

