Software · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat; Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Hasura covers GraphQL API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Hasura actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Hasura |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
- Web support
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- REST APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- API Developmentnot Hasura
- API Gatewaynot Hasura
- API Testingnot Hasura
- API Documentationnot Hasura
- Microservicesnot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot GraphQL Apollo
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot GraphQL Apollo
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- Developer plan caps at 10 users and Standard caps at 30 users before requiring the sales-gated Enterprise tier
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- CommunityFree
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- Community support
- Studio Starter$49/monthly
- Apollo Studio
- GraphQL monitoring
- Collaboration
- Studio Professional$399/monthly
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
- SLA
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Hasura?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Hasura run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Hasura runs on Web.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Hasura cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, Microservices. Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Both handle REST APIs.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apigee
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stoplight
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs 3scale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs AWS API Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless

