API Management · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

GraphQL Apollo
API Management
Complete platform for building GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
API Management
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Thunder Client
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- Developer plan caps at 10 users and Standard caps at 30 users before requiring the sales-gated Enterprise tier
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- CommunityFree
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- Community support
- Studio Starter$49/monthly
- Apollo Studio
- GraphQL monitoring
- Collaboration
- Studio Professional$399/monthly
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
- SLA
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Thunder Client?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Thunder Client cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apigee
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stoplight
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs 3scale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs AWS API Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless
