API Management · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity

GraphQL Apollo
API Management
Complete platform for building GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sanity
API Management
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Sanity covers Content API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Sanity actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- API Developmentnot Sanity
- API Gatewaynot Sanity
- API Testingnot Sanity
- API Documentationnot Sanity
- Microservicesnot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot GraphQL Apollo
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot GraphQL Apollo
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- Developer plan caps at 10 users and Standard caps at 30 users before requiring the sales-gated Enterprise tier
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- CommunityFree
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- Community support
- Studio Starter$49/monthly
- Apollo Studio
- GraphQL monitoring
- Collaboration
- Studio Professional$399/monthly
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
- SLA
Sanity
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Sanity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Sanity?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Sanity at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Sanity run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Sanity runs on Web.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Sanity cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apigee
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stoplight
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs 3scale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs AWS API Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- Sanity vs Appwrite
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Apigee
- Sanity vs Bruno
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Parse Server
- Sanity vs Stoplight
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Sanity vs Thunder Client
- Sanity vs WSO2 API Manager
- Sanity vs 3scale
- Sanity vs Akana
- Sanity vs Asyncapi
- Sanity vs AWS API Gateway
- Sanity vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Sanity vs Backendless
