APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs i2c

i2c
APIs
Configurable card issuing and banking processing platform for banks and programme managers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; i2c developer experience lags API-native competitors, and teams expecting Stripe-grade documentation and sandboxes find an enterprise integration project instead.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, i2c covers Configurable product engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and i2c actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | i2c |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Web, REST API |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in i2c
- Configurable product engine
- Credit and instalments
- Multi-currency
- Fraud and risk tooling
- Digital banking front ends
- Global scheme connectivity
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot i2c
- Schema federationnot i2c
- API analytics and monitoringnot i2c
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot i2c
i2c
- A bank wanting credit, debit and prepaid portfolios on one processor rather than threenot GraphQL Apollo
- An issuer in a market where local scheme and currency support rules out US-centric processorsnot GraphQL Apollo
- A programme manager launching instalment products without building a lending corenot GraphQL Apollo
- A credit union replacing an ageing processor without writing custom code for product rulesnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
i2c
- Developer experience lags API-native competitors, and teams expecting Stripe-grade documentation and sandboxes find an enterprise integration project instead.
- Implementations lean on i2c or partner professional services, so timelines and costs are set by a services queue rather than by your own engineering speed.
- Pricing is per active card and per transaction with monthly minimums, none of it published, so comparing bids requires modelling your own portfolio carefully.
- Configuration flexibility means product behaviour lives in platform settings rather than in your repository, which complicates version control, testing and audit trails.
- As a private company with a broad global footprint, regional support depth is uneven, and a programme in a smaller market may get thinner service than a flagship account.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
i2c
On request- i2c processing platform$undefined/year
- Per-active-card and per-transaction processing fees
- Minimum monthly commitments by programme
- Implementation and configuration professional services
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose i2c if
- You need configurable product engine.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want credit and instalments.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or i2c better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and i2c at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or i2c?
- GraphQL Apollo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GraphQL Apollo and On request for i2c.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or i2c run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. i2c runs on Web, REST API.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Yes. GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. i2c starts at On request.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what i2c is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that i2c cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. i2c covers Configurable product engine, Credit and instalments, Multi-currency, Fraud and risk tooling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
Sourcei2c: Does i2c issue the cards itself?
No. It processes; issuance sits with a bank or licensed issuer, and in most markets you need that relationship separately.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
Sourcei2c: Can it handle revolving credit?
Yes. Credit, instalments and buy-now-pay-later sit on the same platform as debit and prepaid, which is unusual among modern processors.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
Sourcei2c: Is it self-serve?
No. Expect a configuration-led implementation with professional services rather than signing up and calling an API.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Marqeta
- GraphQL Apollo vs Enfuce
- GraphQL Apollo vs Highnote
- GraphQL Apollo vs Paymentology
- GraphQL Apollo vs Lithic
- GraphQL Apollo vs Episode Six
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tribe Payments
- GraphQL Apollo vs Mambu
- GraphQL Apollo vs Skaleet
- GraphQL Apollo vs Temenos Transact
- GraphQL Apollo vs 10x Banking
- GraphQL Apollo vs PubNub
- GraphQL Apollo vs Svix
- GraphQL Apollo vs Synctera
- GraphQL Apollo vs Treblle
- i2c vs Hasura
- i2c vs Appwrite
- i2c vs PocketBase
- i2c vs Sanity
- i2c vs Strapi
- i2c vs GraphQL Playground
- i2c vs Kong Gateway
- i2c vs Parse Server
- i2c vs WSO2 API Manager
- i2c vs Janus Gateway
- i2c vs Directus
- i2c vs KeystoneJS
- i2c vs Solaris
- i2c vs Stainless
- i2c vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- i2c vs Thredd
- i2c vs Thunder Client
- i2c vs Marqeta
- i2c vs Enfuce
- i2c vs Highnote
- i2c vs Paymentology
- i2c vs Lithic
- i2c vs Episode Six
- i2c vs Tribe Payments
- i2c vs Mambu
- i2c vs Skaleet
- i2c vs Temenos Transact
- i2c vs 10x Banking
- i2c vs PubNub
- i2c vs Svix
- i2c vs Synctera
- i2c vs Treblle

