APIs · head to head
Codat vs GraphQL Apollo

Codat
APIs
One API for small business accounting, banking and commerce data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Codat the accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: Codat covers Normalised accounting API, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Codat and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Codat | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | API, Web | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Codat
- Normalised accounting API
- Banking and commerce data
- Lending products
- Write-back
- Business verification
- Supplier onboarding
- Connection management
- Data quality handling
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Codat
- A business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported PDF accountsnot GraphQL Apollo
- A commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterlynot GraphQL Apollo
- A payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capitalnot GraphQL Apollo
- A B2B platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automaticallynot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Codat
- Schema federationnot Codat
- API analytics and monitoringnot Codat
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Codat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Codat
- The accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.
- Pricing is opaque and enterprise shaped for a product developers expect to evaluate technically first, so build decisions get made before anyone knows the unit economics.
- Normalisation hides but does not remove the underlying differences between accounting systems, and edge cases in multi-currency, journals and tax handling surface as data quality problems that your team must reason about in each source system anyway.
- Data quality depends on the small business keeping its books properly, so a lender using ledger data for underwriting inherits the bookkeeping standard of its worst borrower and needs its own validation layer regardless.
- Connection breakage from expired tokens and platform API changes is an ongoing operational load, and a borrower whose connection lapses stops being monitored silently, which is the failure mode that matters most in a lending portfolio.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
Codat
On request- Codat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by connected companies, data types and products
- Lending and verification products priced above core data access
- Annual enterprise agreements
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Codat if
- You need normalised accounting api.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want banking and commerce data.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is Codat or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Codat starts at On request and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Codat or GraphQL Apollo?
- GraphQL Apollo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Codat and Free for GraphQL Apollo.
- Does Codat or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- Codat runs on API, Web. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Yes. GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Codat starts at On request.
- What is Codat best used for?
- Codat is most often used for a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts, a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly, a payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capital, a b2b platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automatically. Of those, a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts and a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can Codat do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- Codat covers Normalised accounting API, Banking and commerce data, Lending products, Write-back. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Codat: What is changing with Xero in 2026?
Xero is introducing a tiered, usage based developer pricing model effective 2 March 2026, with tiers based on the number of customer connections an app holds. That is a new cost in the chain for anyone reading Xero data at scale, whether directly or through Codat.
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceCodat: Can Codat write data back?
Yes. It supports pushing bills, payments and journal entries into accounting systems, not only reading from them.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceCodat: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by connected companies, data types and products, and users consistently describe it as opaque.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceCodat: Does it replace bank data aggregation?
Not entirely. It covers banking alongside accounting and commerce, but lenders commonly run it beside a bank aggregator for transaction level cash flow.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- Codat vs Rutter
- Codat vs Swan
- Codat vs Fintech Farm
- Codat vs Treasury Prime
- Codat vs Synctera
- Codat vs Solaris
- Codat vs Increase
- Codat vs Column
- Codat vs Griffin
- Codat vs Lithic
- Codat vs Unit
- Codat vs Vodeno
- Codat vs Bruno
- Codat vs Bud Financial
- Codat vs Episode Six
- Codat vs Kong Gateway
- Codat vs Marqeta
- Codat vs Meniga
- Codat vs Hasura
- Codat vs Appwrite
- Codat vs PocketBase
- Codat vs Sanity
- Codat vs Strapi
- Codat vs GraphQL Playground
- Codat vs Parse Server
- Codat vs WSO2 API Manager
- Codat vs Janus Gateway
- Codat vs Directus
- Codat vs KeystoneJS
- Codat vs Stainless
- Codat vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Codat vs Thredd
- Codat vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Rutter
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swan
- GraphQL Apollo vs Fintech Farm
- GraphQL Apollo vs Treasury Prime
- GraphQL Apollo vs Synctera
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Increase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Column
- GraphQL Apollo vs Griffin
- GraphQL Apollo vs Lithic
- GraphQL Apollo vs Unit
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vodeno
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bud Financial
- GraphQL Apollo vs Episode Six
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Marqeta
- GraphQL Apollo vs Meniga
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

