Maps · head to head
Global Mapper vs Leaflet

Global Mapper
Maps
A GIS and lidar desktop that still sells a genuine perpetual licence with published prices
- From
- $700/one-time
- Rated
- -

Leaflet
Maps
Leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps, used by millions of developers worldwide
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Leaflet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Global Mapper it is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds; Leaflet 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- They diverge on capability: Global Mapper covers Format breadth, Leaflet covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Global Mapper and Leaflet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Global Mapper | Leaflet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $700/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Global Mapper
- Format breadth
- Lidar processing
- Pixels to Points
- Coordinate transformation
- Terrain analysis
- Scripting
- Mobile companion
Only in Leaflet
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Global Mapper
- A survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scriptsnot Leaflet
- A consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an Esri enterprise agreementnot Leaflet
- An organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet yearsnot Leaflet
- A geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstationnot Leaflet
Leaflet
- Embedding interactive maps in a web pagenot Global Mapper
- Mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsersnot Global Mapper
- Mapping where bundle size matters, at roughly 42 KB of JavaScriptnot Global Mapper
- Extending a basic map with plugins rather than adopting a full platformnot Global Mapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Global Mapper
- It is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds
- The interface has grown by accretion over two decades and features are scattered across menus, so new users are slow to find capabilities that are already installed
- Node-locked perpetual licences are tied to the machine identifier, so a hardware refresh or a failed workstation means a support request rather than a login on a new device
- Multi-user and web publishing are weak relative to Esri or QGIS with a server stack, so it is a desktop analysis tool and not a platform for sharing data across an organisation
- Published prices apply to North America and differ elsewhere, so buyers outside that market must go through a reseller and cannot rely on the listed figures for budgeting
Leaflet
- 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- Performance degrades when rendering large datasets of complex vector geometries without optimization
- Limited dynamic styling support; style is fixed on the server when using raster tiles
- Lacks native support for WMS features; requires plugins like Leaflet.WMS and complex feature identification is cumbersome
- Requires external tile service for map imagery; does not provide map tiles natively
Pricing, plan by plan
Global Mapper
$700/one-time- Global Mapper Standard, node-locked$700/one-time
- Perpetual licence tied to one machine
- First year of maintenance and support included
- Renewal 245 USD per year, optional
- Global Mapper Standard, floating or dongle$1050/one-time
- Shared between users or carried on a USB dongle
- Maintenance renewal 365 USD per year
- Network licence 2,100 USD with a two-seat minimum
- Global Mapper Pro, node-locked$1750/one-time
- Adds lidar classification, feature extraction and Pixels to Points
- Maintenance renewal 610 USD per year
- Upgrade from Standard version 26 costs 1,050 USD
- Global Mapper Pro, floating or dongle$2625/one-time
- Shared or dongle licence
- Maintenance renewal 915 USD per year
- Network licence 5,250 USD with a two-seat minimum
Leaflet
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Leaflet review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Global Mapper if
- You need format breadth.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want lidar processing.
Choose Leaflet if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Global Mapper or Leaflet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time and Leaflet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Global Mapper or Leaflet?
- Leaflet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $700/one-time for Global Mapper and Free for Leaflet.
- Does Global Mapper or Leaflet run on more platforms?
- Global Mapper runs on Windows. Leaflet runs on Web.
- Can I use Leaflet for free?
- Yes. Leaflet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time.
- What is Global Mapper best used for?
- Global Mapper is most often used for a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts, a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement, an organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet years, a geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstation. Of those, a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts and a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement are not what Leaflet is typically brought in for.
- What can Global Mapper do that Leaflet cannot?
- Global Mapper covers Format breadth, Lidar processing, Pixels to Points, Coordinate transformation. Leaflet covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Global Mapper: Is there still a perpetual licence?
Yes. Blue Marble sells perpetual node-locked, floating, dongle and network licences that keep working after maintenance lapses.
Leaflet: Is Leaflet free and open source?
Yes. Leaflet is open-source JavaScript library licensed for free use. Over 400 plugins add capabilities like marker clustering, heatmaps, drawing tools, geocoding, and routing.
SourceGlobal Mapper: What is the difference between Standard and Pro?
Pro is an add-on to a matching Standard licence and carries the lidar classification, feature extraction, Pixels to Points photogrammetry and advanced terrain tools.
Leaflet: How do I include Leaflet in my project via CDN?
Leaflet is available on multiple free CDNs including unpkg, cdnjs, and jsDelivr. Include the CSS stylesheet from https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/dist/leaflet.css and JavaScript from https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/dist/leaflet.js in your HTML head.
SourceGlobal Mapper: Do I have to pay maintenance?
Only for the first year, which is included. After that it is optional; without it the software continues to run but you receive no upgrades or support.
Leaflet: What mapping services does Leaflet support?
Leaflet integrates seamlessly with various mapping services including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Bing, and other custom tile providers, allowing developers to choose the best base layer.
SourceGlobal Mapper: Can it replace ArcGIS?
For desktop format conversion, lidar and terrain analysis, often yes. For enterprise data management, web services and organisation-wide sharing, no.
Leaflet: What is the file size of Leaflet?
Leaflet weighs about 42 KB of JavaScript.
SourceRelated pages
More on Global Mapper
Other head to heads
- Global Mapper vs Esri ArcGIS
- Global Mapper vs SAGA GIS
- Global Mapper vs QGIS
- Global Mapper vs Emlid Studio
- Global Mapper vs WhiteboxTools
- Global Mapper vs Potree
- Global Mapper vs Agisoft Metashape
- Global Mapper vs Leica Infinity
- Global Mapper vs GRASS GIS
- Global Mapper vs Felt
- Global Mapper vs CARTO
- Global Mapper vs GraphHopper
- Global Mapper vs HERE WeGo
- Global Mapper vs IndoorAtlas
- Global Mapper vs Mappedin
- Global Mapper vs MapTiler
- Global Mapper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Global Mapper vs Mapbox
- Global Mapper vs Google Maps Platform
- Global Mapper vs Stadia Maps
- Global Mapper vs HERE Technologies
- Global Mapper vs Apple Maps
- Global Mapper vs OpenLayers
- Global Mapper vs CesiumJS
- Global Mapper vs Bing Maps
- Global Mapper vs OSRM
- Global Mapper vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Global Mapper vs PositionStack
- Global Mapper vs Radar
- Leaflet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Leaflet vs SAGA GIS
- Leaflet vs QGIS
- Leaflet vs Emlid Studio
- Leaflet vs WhiteboxTools
- Leaflet vs Potree
- Leaflet vs Agisoft Metashape
- Leaflet vs Leica Infinity
- Leaflet vs GRASS GIS
- Leaflet vs Felt
- Leaflet vs CARTO
- Leaflet vs GraphHopper
- Leaflet vs HERE WeGo
- Leaflet vs IndoorAtlas
- Leaflet vs Mappedin
- Leaflet vs MapTiler
- Leaflet vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Leaflet vs Mapbox
- Leaflet vs Google Maps Platform
- Leaflet vs Stadia Maps
- Leaflet vs HERE Technologies
- Leaflet vs Apple Maps
- Leaflet vs OpenLayers
- Leaflet vs CesiumJS
- Leaflet vs Bing Maps
- Leaflet vs OSRM
- Leaflet vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Leaflet vs PositionStack
- Leaflet vs Radar
