Maps · head to head
OpenRouteService vs Webfleet

OpenRouteService
Maps
Open-source routing, geocoding, and isochrone APIs based on OpenStreetMap data for developers and enterprises
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only OpenRouteService has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenRouteService free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenRouteService and Webfleet actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenRouteService | Webfleet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenRouteService
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenRouteService
- Directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchairnot Webfleet
- Reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculationsnot Webfleet
- Many-to-many distance matrix calculationsnot Webfleet
- Location geocoding and conversion to coordinatesnot Webfleet
- Points of interest discovery and mappingnot Webfleet
- Elevation data enrichment using SRTM satellite datanot Webfleet
- Vehicle routing problem optimizationnot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot OpenRouteService
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot OpenRouteService
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot OpenRouteService
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot OpenRouteService
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenRouteService
- Free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- API restrictions exist but details not fully documented on main page
- Specific pricing tiers and costs not published on primary website
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenRouteService
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenRouteService review.
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenRouteService if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenRouteService or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenRouteService starts at Free and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenRouteService or Webfleet?
- OpenRouteService has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenRouteService and On request for Webfleet.
- Does OpenRouteService or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- OpenRouteService runs on Web. Webfleet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenRouteService for free?
- Yes. OpenRouteService has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Webfleet starts at On request.
- What is OpenRouteService best used for?
- OpenRouteService is most often used for directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchair, reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculations, many-to-many distance matrix calculations, location geocoding and conversion to coordinates. Of those, directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchair and reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculations are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenRouteService do that Webfleet cannot?
- OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenRouteService: How much does OpenRouteService cost?
OpenRouteService is free to use and open source. The free tier includes up to 500 Isochrones requests per day. Specific pricing for higher usage tiers is not published on the main pricing page.
SourceWebfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
OpenRouteService: Is there a free version of OpenRouteService?
Yes, OpenRouteService is completely free to use and built on open source technology. All services are presented as free to use and based on user-generated and collaboratively collected geographic data from OpenStreetMap.
SourceWebfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Related pages
More on OpenRouteService
Other head to heads
- OpenRouteService vs Google Maps Platform
- OpenRouteService vs Mapbox
- OpenRouteService vs HERE Technologies
- OpenRouteService vs Apple Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Geoapify
- OpenRouteService vs LocationIQ
- OpenRouteService vs Stadia Maps
- OpenRouteService vs OsmAnd
- OpenRouteService vs Bing Maps
- OpenRouteService vs GraphHopper
- OpenRouteService vs MapTiler
- OpenRouteService vs MAPS.ME
- OpenRouteService vs OSRM
- OpenRouteService vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- OpenRouteService vs PositionStack
- OpenRouteService vs Radar
- OpenRouteService vs SAGA GIS
- OpenRouteService vs Samsara
- OpenRouteService vs Geotab
- OpenRouteService vs Teletrac Navman
- OpenRouteService vs Lytx
- OpenRouteService vs Motive
- OpenRouteService vs Fleet Complete
- OpenRouteService vs Uptake
- OpenRouteService vs AssetWorks
- OpenRouteService vs Omnitracs
- OpenRouteService vs Chevin FleetWave
- OpenRouteService vs CalAmp
- OpenRouteService vs Whip Around
- OpenRouteService vs Ridecell
- OpenRouteService vs Zonar Systems
- OpenRouteService vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Google Maps Platform
- Webfleet vs Mapbox
- Webfleet vs HERE Technologies
- Webfleet vs Apple Maps
- Webfleet vs Geoapify
- Webfleet vs LocationIQ
- Webfleet vs Stadia Maps
- Webfleet vs OsmAnd
- Webfleet vs Bing Maps
- Webfleet vs GraphHopper
- Webfleet vs MapTiler
- Webfleet vs MAPS.ME
- Webfleet vs OSRM
- Webfleet vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Webfleet vs PositionStack
- Webfleet vs Radar
- Webfleet vs SAGA GIS
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
