Manufacturing · head to head
GENESIS Version 11 vs Sight Machine

GENESIS Version 11
Manufacturing
Iconics SCADA and visualisation under Mitsubishi Electric, now sold with unlimited tag licensing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sight Machine
Manufacturing
Enterprise manufacturing data platform that builds a plant data model rather than a dashboard
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GENESIS Version 11 the name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.; Sight Machine onboarding is a data engineering project measured in months per plant, so value arrives long after the contract starts and the internal sponsor needs the patience and budget to survive that gap.
- They diverge on capability: GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, Sight Machine covers Unified plant data model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GENESIS Version 11 and Sight Machine actually diverge.
| Attribute | GENESIS Version 11 | Sight Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GENESIS Version 11
- Unlimited tag licensing
- GraphWorX
- Hyper Historian
- AnalytiX
- Web and mobile clients
- BACnet and building protocols
- Alarm and notification
- Energy AnalytiX
Only in Sight Machine
- Unified plant data model
- Broad ingestion
- Cross plant benchmarking
- Root cause analysis
- Natural language querying
- Cloud data platform delivery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GENESIS Version 11
- A university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansionnot Sight Machine
- A data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3D floor model rather than a line diagramnot Sight Machine
- A water utility wanting pump station status on a GIS map alongside historised flow and pressure datanot Sight Machine
- A Mitsubishi Electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllersnot Sight Machine
Sight Machine
- A corporate operations team that cannot compare plant performance because every site defines a stoppage differentlynot GENESIS Version 11
- A manufacturer whose historian data is plentiful but has never been modelled into anything a business can querynot GENESIS Version 11
- A group standardising manufacturing reporting into a cloud data warehouse alongside finance and supply chain datanot GENESIS Version 11
- A quality organisation investigating a defect that appears at several plants with different equipmentnot GENESIS Version 11
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GENESIS Version 11
- The name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.
- Unlimited licensing sets a high floor: a small site with a few hundred points pays for capacity it cannot use, and tag-priced competitors remain cheaper below a few thousand points.
- It is a Windows and Microsoft-stack product, depending on SQL Server and Windows services, so Linux-first or containerised deployment strategies do not apply to it.
- Mitsubishi Electric now owns it outright, and roadmap priorities follow that group’s factory automation strategy rather than the independent building-automation direction Iconics previously set.
- The 3D and GIS visualisation that distinguishes it takes real modelling effort to populate, and estates that skip that work end up with an expensive licence driving conventional 2D screens.
Sight Machine
- Onboarding is a data engineering project measured in months per plant, so value arrives long after the contract starts and the internal sponsor needs the patience and budget to survive that gap.
- It assumes the instrumentation already exists, so a plant whose machines produce no usable data gets nothing from a data platform and needs to solve connectivity first with a different class of product.
- Pricing scales with plants and data volume and is never published, which puts it out of reach for single site manufacturers regardless of how relevant the capability sounds.
- It is not an MES and does not control or execute anything, so it sits on top of the operational systems and adds a layer to maintain rather than replacing one.
- Success depends on a central team that owns definitions and enforces them, and in groups where plants retain autonomy the standardisation the platform provides gets quietly ignored at site level.
Pricing, plan by plan
GENESIS Version 11
On request- GENESIS Version 11$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags, users and connected devices within a licence
- Licensed by product module rather than by point count
- Sold and configured through Mitsubishi Electric and Iconics system integrators
Sight Machine
On request- Sight Machine$undefined/year
- Enterprise manufacturing data platform
- Per plant onboarding and modelling services
- Cross site analytics and benchmarking
Which should you pick?
Choose GENESIS Version 11 if
- You need unlimited tag licensing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want graphworx.
Choose Sight Machine if
- You need unified plant data model.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want broad ingestion.
Questions people ask
- Is GENESIS Version 11 or Sight Machine better?
- Neither clearly leads. GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Sight Machine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GENESIS Version 11 or Sight Machine?
- GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Sight Machine at On request.
- Does GENESIS Version 11 or Sight Machine run on more platforms?
- GENESIS Version 11 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Sight Machine runs on Web, API.
- What is GENESIS Version 11 best used for?
- GENESIS Version 11 is most often used for a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion, a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram, a water utility wanting pump station status on a gis map alongside historised flow and pressure data, a mitsubishi electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllers. Of those, a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion and a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram are not what Sight Machine is typically brought in for.
- What can GENESIS Version 11 do that Sight Machine cannot?
- GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, GraphWorX, Hyper Historian, AnalytiX. Sight Machine covers Unified plant data model, Broad ingestion, Cross plant benchmarking, Root cause analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GENESIS Version 11: Is GENESIS64 discontinued?
It has been superseded. GENESIS Version 11 is the current release and the name GENESIS64 is retired.
Sight Machine: Is this an OEE product?
It can produce OEE, but buying it for OEE alone is expensive. The reason to buy it is cross plant data standardisation.
GENESIS Version 11: Does version 11 really have no tag limits?
Yes, tag, user and device counting was removed in version 11. Licensing is by module instead.
Sight Machine: Does it need a historian?
It reads from historians, control systems and MES. Some source of machine data is a prerequisite.
GENESIS Version 11: Who owns Iconics now?
Mitsubishi Electric, which took full ownership. Iconics continues to operate under its own name from Massachusetts.
Sight Machine: How long does a plant take to onboard?
Plan in months per plant, depending on how many sources and how inconsistent the existing definitions are.
GENESIS Version 11: Can it act as a building management system on its own?
It is the supervisory and analytics layer. It reads BACnet and building controllers but does not replace field-level plant controllers.
Sight Machine: Who is the buyer?
A corporate manufacturing, quality or digital function. It is rarely a plant level purchase.
Related pages
More on GENESIS Version 11
More on Sight Machine
Other head to heads
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Ignition
- GENESIS Version 11 vs AVEVA System Platform
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- GENESIS Version 11 vs COPA-DATA zenon
- GENESIS Version 11 vs ABB 800xA
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GENESIS Version 11 vs OpenBOM
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Kepware Server
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Markforged Eiger
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Oqton
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Petasense
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Simplify3D
- GENESIS Version 11 vs TrendMiner
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Xometry
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Flow Software
- GENESIS Version 11 vs TrakSYS
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Litmus Edge
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Seeq
- GENESIS Version 11 vs MachineMetrics
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Guidewheel
- GENESIS Version 11 vs QAD Redzone
- GENESIS Version 11 vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Prodsmart
- GENESIS Version 11 vs PTC Windchill
- GENESIS Version 11 vs LabVIEW
- GENESIS Version 11 vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sight Machine vs Ignition
- Sight Machine vs AVEVA System Platform
- Sight Machine vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Sight Machine vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Sight Machine vs ABB 800xA
- Sight Machine vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Sight Machine vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Sight Machine vs OpenBOM
- Sight Machine vs Kepware Server
- Sight Machine vs Markforged Eiger
- Sight Machine vs Oqton
- Sight Machine vs Petasense
- Sight Machine vs Simplify3D
- Sight Machine vs TrendMiner
- Sight Machine vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sight Machine vs Xometry
- Sight Machine vs Flow Software
- Sight Machine vs TrakSYS
- Sight Machine vs Litmus Edge
- Sight Machine vs Seeq
- Sight Machine vs MachineMetrics
- Sight Machine vs Guidewheel
- Sight Machine vs QAD Redzone
- Sight Machine vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Sight Machine vs Prodsmart
- Sight Machine vs PTC Windchill
- Sight Machine vs LabVIEW
- Sight Machine vs SKF Enlight Centre
