Manufacturing · head to head
GENESIS Version 11 vs Seeq

GENESIS Version 11
Manufacturing
Iconics SCADA and visualisation under Mitsubishi Electric, now sold with unlimited tag licensing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Seeq
Manufacturing
Self-service analytics for process manufacturing time-series data sitting on top of existing historians
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GENESIS Version 11 the name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.; Seeq named-user pricing suits a small core team but scales badly: a site wanting a hundred engineers with occasional access pays for a hundred licences that mostly sit idle, which is why deployments often stay artificially narrow.
- They diverge on capability: GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, Seeq covers Query in place.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GENESIS Version 11 and Seeq actually diverge.
| Attribute | GENESIS Version 11 | Seeq |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GENESIS Version 11
- Unlimited tag licensing
- GraphWorX
- Hyper Historian
- AnalytiX
- Web and mobile clients
- BACnet and building protocols
- Alarm and notification
- Energy AnalytiX
Only in Seeq
- Query in place
- Capsules
- Asset trees
- Seeq Data Lab
- Organizer
- Multi-source joins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GENESIS Version 11
- A university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansionnot Seeq
- A data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3D floor model rather than a line diagramnot Seeq
- A water utility wanting pump station status on a GIS map alongside historised flow and pressure datanot Seeq
- A Mitsubishi Electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllersnot Seeq
Seeq
- A pharmaceutical plant comparing hundreds of batches against a golden batch profile without exporting historian data into spreadsheetsnot GENESIS Version 11
- A reliability engineer investigating why a compressor trips, needing to overlay vibration, process and maintenance data across two years of historynot GENESIS Version 11
- Refinery process engineers building a recurring shift report that pulls live values rather than being rebuilt by hand each weeknot GENESIS Version 11
- A site whose data lake project has stalled and that needs engineers analysing plant history now, without waiting for an ingestion pipelinenot GENESIS Version 11
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GENESIS Version 11
- The name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.
- Unlimited licensing sets a high floor: a small site with a few hundred points pays for capacity it cannot use, and tag-priced competitors remain cheaper below a few thousand points.
- It is a Windows and Microsoft-stack product, depending on SQL Server and Windows services, so Linux-first or containerised deployment strategies do not apply to it.
- Mitsubishi Electric now owns it outright, and roadmap priorities follow that group’s factory automation strategy rather than the independent building-automation direction Iconics previously set.
- The 3D and GIS visualisation that distinguishes it takes real modelling effort to populate, and estates that skip that work end up with an expensive licence driving conventional 2D screens.
Seeq
- Named-user pricing suits a small core team but scales badly: a site wanting a hundred engineers with occasional access pays for a hundred licences that mostly sit idle, which is why deployments often stay artificially narrow.
- Seeq inherits whatever quality exists in the historian, so plants with unstructured tag names and no asset model spend real effort building asset trees in Seeq that should have been fixed upstream.
- Certain historian connectors are charged separately, so the licence quote and the actual cost of connecting your specific data sources are two different numbers.
- It is analysis, not control or action; findings still have to be carried into a CMMS or a control change by hand, so value depends on a workflow Seeq does not provide.
- The product assumes competent process engineers. Organisations without that skill in-house get little from it, because Seeq deliberately does not ship prebuilt failure models the way condition monitoring vendors do.
Pricing, plan by plan
GENESIS Version 11
On request- GENESIS Version 11$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags, users and connected devices within a licence
- Licensed by product module rather than by point count
- Sold and configured through Mitsubishi Electric and Iconics system integrators
Seeq
On request- Seeq$undefined/year
- Licensed per named user, not per tag
- Separate charges for certain historian connectors
- Cloud-hosted and self-hosted deployments quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose GENESIS Version 11 if
- You need unlimited tag licensing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want graphworx.
Choose Seeq if
- You need query in place.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux.
- You also want capsules.
Questions people ask
- Is GENESIS Version 11 or Seeq better?
- Neither clearly leads. GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Seeq at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GENESIS Version 11 or Seeq?
- GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Seeq at On request.
- Does GENESIS Version 11 or Seeq run on more platforms?
- GENESIS Version 11 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Seeq runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux.
- What is GENESIS Version 11 best used for?
- GENESIS Version 11 is most often used for a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion, a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram, a water utility wanting pump station status on a gis map alongside historised flow and pressure data, a mitsubishi electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllers. Of those, a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion and a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram are not what Seeq is typically brought in for.
- What can GENESIS Version 11 do that Seeq cannot?
- GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, GraphWorX, Hyper Historian, AnalytiX. Seeq covers Query in place, Capsules, Asset trees, Seeq Data Lab.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GENESIS Version 11: Is GENESIS64 discontinued?
It has been superseded. GENESIS Version 11 is the current release and the name GENESIS64 is retired.
Seeq: Does Seeq store my data?
No. It queries connected historians and databases in place. Removing Seeq leaves your data exactly where it was.
GENESIS Version 11: Does version 11 really have no tag limits?
Yes, tag, user and device counting was removed in version 11. Licensing is by module instead.
Seeq: Who owns Seeq?
It is an independent private company in Seattle, most recently funded by a 2024 growth round led by Sixth Street. It has not been taken over by a private equity buyer.
GENESIS Version 11: Who owns Iconics now?
Mitsubishi Electric, which took full ownership. Iconics continues to operate under its own name from Massachusetts.
Seeq: How is it licensed?
Per named user, with some historian connectors charged separately. Nothing is published; every number comes from a quote.
GENESIS Version 11: Can it act as a building management system on its own?
It is the supervisory and analytics layer. It reads BACnet and building controllers but does not replace field-level plant controllers.
Seeq: Do I need a data scientist?
No, and that is the point. Workbench is aimed at process engineers. Data Lab exists for the minority who want Python.
Related pages
More on GENESIS Version 11
Other head to heads
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Ignition
- GENESIS Version 11 vs AVEVA System Platform
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- GENESIS Version 11 vs COPA-DATA zenon
- GENESIS Version 11 vs ABB 800xA
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GENESIS Version 11 vs OpenBOM
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Kepware Server
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Markforged Eiger
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Oqton
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Petasense
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Simplify3D
- GENESIS Version 11 vs TrendMiner
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Xometry
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Sight Machine
- GENESIS Version 11 vs eMaint
- GENESIS Version 11 vs SolidWorks
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Erbessd Instruments
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Flow Software
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Oden Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- GENESIS Version 11 vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GENESIS Version 11 vs MOVUS
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Paperless Parts
- Seeq vs Ignition
- Seeq vs AVEVA System Platform
- Seeq vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Seeq vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Seeq vs ABB 800xA
- Seeq vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Seeq vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Seeq vs OpenBOM
- Seeq vs Kepware Server
- Seeq vs Markforged Eiger
- Seeq vs Oqton
- Seeq vs Petasense
- Seeq vs Simplify3D
- Seeq vs TrendMiner
- Seeq vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Seeq vs Xometry
- Seeq vs Sight Machine
- Seeq vs eMaint
- Seeq vs SolidWorks
- Seeq vs Erbessd Instruments
- Seeq vs Flow Software
- Seeq vs Oden Technologies
- Seeq vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Seeq vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Seeq vs MOVUS
- Seeq vs Paperless Parts
