Softwr

Employee Engagement · head to head

Fond vs Staffbase

Fond logo

Fond

Employee Engagement

Employee experience platform for modern teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Staffbase logo

Staffbase

Employee Engagement

Employee communications platform for all workers

From
€3/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fond fond.co redirects to Reward Gateway. No pricing plans or costs are published on Reward Gateway's website; Staffbase staffbase publishes no price list at all and states directly that it does not publish prices
  • They diverge on capability: Fond covers Social recognition, Staffbase covers Employee app.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fond and Staffbase actually diverge.

Attributes where Fond and Staffbase differ
AttributeFondStaffbase
Starting priceOn request€3/month
Founded20132014

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Employee Engagement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fond

  • Social recognition
  • Engagement tools
  • Culture programs
  • Mobile app
  • Analytics dashboard
  • Manager resources
  • Customizable workflows
  • Reporting

Only in Staffbase

  • Employee app
  • Intranet
  • Email campaigns
  • Digital signage
  • News channels
  • Chat
  • Surveys
  • Analytics

Both cover

  • Slack
  • Workday

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fond

  • Peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each othernot Staffbase
  • Redeeming points against a rewards cataloguenot Staffbase
  • Corporate perks and discounts for staffnot Staffbase
  • Running a recognition programme across international officesnot Staffbase

Staffbase

  • Employee communication and engagement for frontline workersnot Fond
  • Internal communications for dispersed teamsnot Fond
  • Mobile-first employee experience platformnot Fond
  • Multi-channel employee messagingnot Fond

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fond

  • Fond.co redirects to Reward Gateway. No pricing plans or costs are published on Reward Gateway's website
  • Requires contacting the company through demo request forms and ROI calculators for custom quotes

Staffbase

  • Staffbase publishes no price list at all and states directly that it does not publish prices
  • Every route to a number is a sales conversation; the vendor says most customers receive a tailored proposal 3 to 5 business days after a first call
  • Pricing is shaped by workforce composition, so the desk-worker to frontline mix determines the rate rather than a published per-seat figure
  • Frontline employees are licensed on a separate reduced tier with a narrower capability set than desk workers
  • Multi-brand and multi-region enterprise configurations are scoped and priced individually
  • The vendor cites a typical 90 days from signed contract to a fully branded launch
  • Intranet, email and digital signage are separate channels added on top of the employee app rather than one bundled product

Pricing, plan by plan

Fond

On request
  • Fond Platform$undefined/month
    • Recognition
    • Engagement tools
    • Culture building

Staffbase

€3/month
  • Starter$3/month
    • Employee app
    • News channels
    • Chat
  • Business$undefined/month
    • Intranet
    • Multi-channel
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Fond if

  • You need social recognition.
  • You also want engagement tools.

Choose Staffbase if

  • You need employee app.
  • You also want intranet.

Questions people ask

Is Fond or Staffbase better?
Neither clearly leads. Fond starts at On request and Staffbase at €3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fond or Staffbase?
Fond starts at On request and Staffbase at €3/month.
Does Fond or Staffbase run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Fond best used for?
Fond is most often used for peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each other, redeeming points against a rewards catalogue, corporate perks and discounts for staff, running a recognition programme across international offices. Of those, peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each other and redeeming points against a rewards catalogue are not what Staffbase is typically brought in for.
What can Fond do that Staffbase cannot?
Fond covers Social recognition, Engagement tools, Culture programs, Mobile app. Staffbase covers Employee app, Intranet, Email campaigns, Digital signage. Both handle Slack, Workday.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Fond: Is Fond still operating under that brand?

Fond.co redirects to Reward Gateway, suggesting Fond has been acquired or rebranded under the Reward Gateway brand.

Source
Staffbase: How much does Staffbase cost?

Staffbase does not publish standard pricing. The company uses a custom quote-based model with tailored proposals because 'no two workforces look alike.' Pricing structures vary for frontline workers, mixed desk and frontline environments, and enterprise configurations.

Source
Fond: How does Reward Gateway publish pricing?

Reward Gateway does not disclose specific pricing tiers or costs on their website. Prospective customers must contact the company through demo requests or ROI calculators.

Source
Staffbase: How quickly can I get a Staffbase quote?

Staffbase provides tailored proposals within 3-5 business days after an initial consultation. Most teams connect with sales within 48 hours of requesting a quote.

Source
Staffbase: Does Staffbase pricing differ for frontline versus desk workers?

Yes, Staffbase offers frontline-specific pricing for workers without desk access, and flexible mixed pricing for organizations combining both types of employees. This approach allows organizations to extend reach without increasing enterprise licensing costs.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads