Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs TomTom Developer Portal

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
TomTom Developer Portal
Maps
TomTom provides mapping and traffic APIs, SDKs, and data products for developers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; TomTom Developer Portal default rate limits on self-serve plans are modest at approximately 5 requests per second; higher limits require contracts
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, TomTom Developer Portal covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and TomTom Developer Portal actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlas.co | TomTom Developer Portal |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | freemium |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in TomTom Developer Portal
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot TomTom Developer Portal
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot TomTom Developer Portal
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot TomTom Developer Portal
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot TomTom Developer Portal
TomTom Developer Portal
No use cases recorded yet. See the TomTom Developer Portal review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
TomTom Developer Portal
- Default rate limits on self-serve plans are modest at approximately 5 requests per second; higher limits require contracts
- Limited POI rich media compared to Google Places; no reviews, photos, or user-generated content
- Smaller developer community with fewer tutorials and Stack Overflow answers than Google or Mapbox
- No official Flutter SDK; developers must use third-party plugins for Flutter integration
- Maps SDK for Web v6 deprecated as of February 2026 with migration required to newer SDK
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
TomTom Developer Portal
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TomTom Developer Portal review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose TomTom Developer Portal if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or TomTom Developer Portal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and TomTom Developer Portal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or TomTom Developer Portal?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and On request for TomTom Developer Portal.
- Does Atlas.co or TomTom Developer Portal run on more platforms?
- Atlas.co runs on Web. TomTom Developer Portal runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. TomTom Developer Portal starts at On request.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what TomTom Developer Portal is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that TomTom Developer Portal cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. TomTom Developer Portal covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
TomTom Developer Portal: Does TomTom Developer Portal have a free tier?
Yes. TomTom offers a freemium plan with 50,000 tile requests plus 2,500 non-tile requests daily at no cost with no credit card required, and commercial use is permitted.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
TomTom Developer Portal: What APIs does TomTom provide?
TomTom provides REST APIs for Maps (display raster or vector maps), Navigation (routing and turn-by-turn), Places (geocoding and POI search), and Traffic (real-time flow and incidents), plus JavaScript SDK and mobile SDKs.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
TomTom Developer Portal: What JavaScript SDKs are available?
TomTom provides Maps SDK for JavaScript with TypeScript support, a Services library as a wrapper for REST APIs, and mobile integration through NativeScript WebView for iOS and Android.
Atlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
More on TomTom Developer Portal
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Bing Maps
- Atlas.co vs Waze
- Atlas.co vs Citymapper
- Atlas.co vs Mappedin
- Atlas.co vs MapTiler
- Atlas.co vs Gaia GPS
- Atlas.co vs GraphHopper
- Atlas.co vs IndoorAtlas
- Atlas.co vs HERE WeGo
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Esri ArcGIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs CARTO
- TomTom Developer Portal vs QGIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Felt
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Correlator3D
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Global Mapper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs GRASS GIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Fused
- TomTom Developer Portal vs deck.gl
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Ride with GPS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Kepler.gl
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Foursquare Places API
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Geoapify
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Google Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Leica Infinity
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Mapbox
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Google Maps Platform
- TomTom Developer Portal vs HERE Technologies
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Bing Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Waze
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Citymapper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Mappedin
- TomTom Developer Portal vs MapTiler
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Gaia GPS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs GraphHopper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs IndoorAtlas
- TomTom Developer Portal vs HERE WeGo
