Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapillary

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Mapillary
Maps
Platform for street-level imagery that crowdsources images to map the world and
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; Mapillary no pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Mapillary covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and Mapillary actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | Mapillary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | freemium |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in Mapillary
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Mapillary
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Mapillary
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Mapillary
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Mapillary
Mapillary
- Street-level imagery for map editing and verificationnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Crowdsourcing photos to keep a map currentnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Extracting map features automatically with computer visionnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Embedding street imagery with MapillaryJSnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Mapillary
- No pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- Unclear monetization strategy makes it difficult for businesses to understand licensing costs for commercial use
- No published tier structure or feature limits visible to potential customers
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Mapillary
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mapillary review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or Mapillary better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Mapillary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or Mapillary?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Mapillary at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or Mapillary run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Mapillary runs on Web.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what Mapillary is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that Mapillary cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. Mapillary covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Mapillary: What is the pricing model for Mapillary?
Mapillary does not publish pricing information on its main website pages. The platform focuses on features like street-level imagery access, map updating through computer vision, and open data sharing, but specific costs and licensing tiers are not disclosed publicly.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Mapillary: Can I use Mapillary for commercial purposes?
Specific details about commercial licensing for Mapillary are not published on the main website. Interested businesses should contact Mapillary directly through their support channels to discuss commercial use cases and licensing options.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
Mapillary: Is Mapillary free to use for individual contributors?
Mapillary emphasizes open data sharing and community contributions but specific details about free vs. paid access for individuals are not clearly stated on the main website. Contact Mapillary support for clarification on access terms.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CesiumJS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Correlator3D
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Emlid Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Places API
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Kepler.gl
- Mapillary vs QGIS
- Mapillary vs SW Maps
- Mapillary vs Felt
- Mapillary vs CARTO
- Mapillary vs Global Mapper
- Mapillary vs GRASS GIS
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Mapillary vs Trailforks
- Mapillary vs onX Maps
- Mapillary vs Mapbox
- Mapillary vs Google Maps Platform
- Mapillary vs Leaflet
- Mapillary vs Bing Maps
- Mapillary vs Cesium ion
- Mapillary vs Citymapper
- Mapillary vs Gaia GPS
- Mapillary vs GraphHopper
- Mapillary vs HERE Technologies
- Mapillary vs Apple Maps
- Mapillary vs CesiumJS
- Mapillary vs Ride with GPS
- Mapillary vs AllTrails
- Mapillary vs Correlator3D
- Mapillary vs Emlid Studio
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Places API
- Mapillary vs Kepler.gl
