Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs Jitsu

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Jitsu covers Event collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and Jitsu actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot Jitsu
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot Jitsu
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot Jitsu
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot Jitsu
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Authy
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Authy
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Authy
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or Jitsu better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and Jitsu at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or Jitsu?
- Authy starts at Free and Jitsu at Free.
- Does Authy or Jitsu run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what Jitsu is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that Jitsu cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Atlantis
- Authy vs Tilt
- Authy vs Visual Studio Code
- Authy vs Penpot
- Authy vs Bazel
- Authy vs Eclipse IDE
- Authy vs Pants Build
- Authy vs Ansible
- Authy vs Helix
- Authy vs Notepad++
- Authy vs Steampipe
- Authy vs Backstage
- Authy vs Blacksmith
- Authy vs Coder
- Authy vs Garden
- Authy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Authy vs HCP Terraform
- Jitsu vs LastPass
- Jitsu vs 1Password
- Jitsu vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jitsu vs Norton 360
- Jitsu vs Google Authenticator
- Jitsu vs Cisco Duo
- Jitsu vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jitsu vs RoboForm
- Jitsu vs ExpressVPN
- Jitsu vs Authelia
- Jitsu vs Stytch
- Jitsu vs WorkOS
- Jitsu vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Jitsu vs Sticky Password
- Jitsu vs Surfshark
- Jitsu vs Tanium
- Jitsu vs Teleport
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helix
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Backstage
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Garden
- Jitsu vs GitLab CI/CD
- Jitsu vs HCP Terraform
