Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Entrust Identity as a Service

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Blacksmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Blacksmith
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Blacksmith
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Blacksmith
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- Blacksmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Blacksmith and $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service.
- Does Blacksmith or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Yes. Blacksmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Cisco Duo
- Blacksmith vs JumpCloud
- Blacksmith vs Ping Identity
- Blacksmith vs Frontegg
- Blacksmith vs Authelia
- Blacksmith vs Beyond Identity
- Blacksmith vs Transmit Security
- Blacksmith vs Akeyless
- Blacksmith vs authentik
- Blacksmith vs Logto
- Blacksmith vs Speakeasy
- Blacksmith vs Authy
- Blacksmith vs ExpressVPN
- Blacksmith vs Falco
- Blacksmith vs Fenergo
- Blacksmith vs Google Authenticator
- Blacksmith vs Grype
- Blacksmith vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs WarpBuild
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Namespace
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nx Cloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs OpsLevel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Garden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ConfigCat
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Dagger
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Rust
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ansible
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs PartyKit
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs PhpStorm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pieces for Developers
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RAD Studio
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Refact
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
